Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, Eugene [1 ]
Eo, Mi Young [1 ]
Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen [1 ]
Yang, Hoon Joo [1 ]
Myoung, Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Soung Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dent Res Inst, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110768, South Korea
关键词
Impacted third molar; Vertical impaction; Radiographic infrabony defect (RID); Pederson's difficulty index (DI); Panoramic radiograph; PERIODONTAL STATUS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; SURGERY; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1186/s40902-018-0187-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The mandibular third molar (M3) is typically the last permanent tooth to erupt because of insufficient space and thick soft tissues covering its surface. Problems such as alveolar bone loss, development of a periodontal pocket, exposure of cementum, gingival recession, and dental caries can be found in the adjacent second molars (M2) following M3 extraction. The specific aims of the study were to assess the amount and rate of bone regeneration on the distal surface of M2 and to evaluate the aspects of bone regeneration in terms of varying degree of impaction. Methods: Four series of panoramic radiographic images were obtained from the selected cases, including images from the first visit, immediately after extraction, 6 weeks, and 6 months after extraction. ImageJ software (R) (NIH, USA) was used to measure linear distance from the region of interest to the distal root of the adjacent M2. Radiographic infrabony defect (RID) values were calculated from the measured radiographic bone height and cementoenamel junction with distortion compensation. Repeated measures of analysis of variance and one-way analysis of variance were conducted to analyze the statistical significant difference between RID and time, and a Spearman correlation test was conducted to assess the relationship between Pederson's difficulty index (DI) and RID. Results: A large RID (> 6 mm) can be reduced gradually and consistently over time. More than half of the samples recovered nearly to their normal healthy condition (RID <= 3 mm) by the 6-month follow-up. DI affected the first 6 weeks of post-extraction period and only showed a significant positive correlation with respect to the difference between baseline and final RID. Conclusions: Additional treatments on M2 for a minimum of 6 months after an M3 extraction could be recommended. Although DI may affect bone regeneration during the early healing period, further study is required to elucidate any possible factors associated with the healing process. The DI does not cause any long-term adverse effects on bone regeneration after surgical extraction.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A novel concentrated growth factor (CGF) and bio-oss based strategy for second molar protection after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: a randomized controlled clinical study
    Sun, Shoufu
    Xu, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Zhongxiao
    Zhang, Ying
    Wei, Wenjia
    Guo, Ke
    Jiang, Yunan N.
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [32] A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of xenograft to prevent periodontal defects after mandibular third molar extraction
    Toledano-Serrabona, Jorge
    Ruiz-Romero, Victor
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Gay-Escoda, Cosme
    Angeles Sanchez-Garces, Ma
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2021, 26 (04): : E414 - E421
  • [33] Postoperative Infection after Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: An Analysis of 110 Consecutive Procedures
    Al-Asfour, Adel
    MEDICAL PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE, 2009, 18 (01) : 48 - 52
  • [34] A mechanical and three-dimensional finite element study of the optimum tooth sectioning depth during the extraction of low-level horizontally impacted mandibular third molar
    Wei Xu
    Jie Shen
    Kuncai Li
    Tianqi Zhao
    Binqing Xie
    Junliang Chen
    Yun He
    Odontology, 2024, 112 : 242 - 249
  • [35] Patient morbidity after impacted third molar extraction with different flap designs. A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Glera-Suarez, Pablo
    Soto-Penaloza, David
    Penarrocha-Oltra, David
    Penarrocha-Diago, Miguel
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2020, 25 (02): : E233 - E239
  • [36] To Study the Impact of Tooth Sectioning on Postoperative Pain, Swelling and Trismus After Surgical Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars
    Karpe, Tanveer
    Sanober, Arshiya
    Nasyam, Fazil A.
    Soumya, Sureddy
    Seethamsetty, Swetcha
    Sarepally, Godvine
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [37] Impact of Single-Session Intraoral and Extraoral Photobiomodulation on Pain Control after Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: A Pilot Study
    Tenore, Gianluca
    Mohsen, Ahmed
    Pergolini, Daniele
    Le Rose, Michele
    Del Vecchio, Alessandro
    Palaia, Gaspare
    Rocchetti, Federica
    Fantozzi, Paolo Junior
    Podda, Gian Marco
    Romeo, Umberto
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [38] Randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of absorbable collagen sponge after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: split-mouth design
    Kim, Jin-Woo
    Seong, Tae-Whan
    Cho, Sura
    Kim, Sun-Jong
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [39] Does Topical Ozone Therapy Improve Patient Comfort After Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar? A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sivalingam, Varun P.
    Panneerselvam, Elavenil
    Raja, Krishnakumar V. B.
    Gopi, Gayathri
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (01) : 51.e1 - 51.e9
  • [40] Inferior Alveolar Nerve Sensory Disturbance After Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Evaluation Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Panoramic Radiography: A Pilot Study
    Guerrero, Maria Eugenia
    Nackaerts, Olivia
    Beinsberger, Jilke
    Horner, Keith
    Schoenaers, Joseph
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (10) : 2264 - 2270