Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Kim, Eugene [1 ]
Eo, Mi Young [1 ]
Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen [1 ]
Yang, Hoon Joo [1 ]
Myoung, Hoon [1 ]
Kim, Soung Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Dent, Dent Res Inst, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 101 Daehak Ro, Seoul 110768, South Korea
关键词
Impacted third molar; Vertical impaction; Radiographic infrabony defect (RID); Pederson's difficulty index (DI); Panoramic radiograph; PERIODONTAL STATUS; TOOTH EXTRACTION; SURGERY; DEFECTS;
D O I
10.1186/s40902-018-0187-8
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The mandibular third molar (M3) is typically the last permanent tooth to erupt because of insufficient space and thick soft tissues covering its surface. Problems such as alveolar bone loss, development of a periodontal pocket, exposure of cementum, gingival recession, and dental caries can be found in the adjacent second molars (M2) following M3 extraction. The specific aims of the study were to assess the amount and rate of bone regeneration on the distal surface of M2 and to evaluate the aspects of bone regeneration in terms of varying degree of impaction. Methods: Four series of panoramic radiographic images were obtained from the selected cases, including images from the first visit, immediately after extraction, 6 weeks, and 6 months after extraction. ImageJ software (R) (NIH, USA) was used to measure linear distance from the region of interest to the distal root of the adjacent M2. Radiographic infrabony defect (RID) values were calculated from the measured radiographic bone height and cementoenamel junction with distortion compensation. Repeated measures of analysis of variance and one-way analysis of variance were conducted to analyze the statistical significant difference between RID and time, and a Spearman correlation test was conducted to assess the relationship between Pederson's difficulty index (DI) and RID. Results: A large RID (> 6 mm) can be reduced gradually and consistently over time. More than half of the samples recovered nearly to their normal healthy condition (RID <= 3 mm) by the 6-month follow-up. DI affected the first 6 weeks of post-extraction period and only showed a significant positive correlation with respect to the difference between baseline and final RID. Conclusions: Additional treatments on M2 for a minimum of 6 months after an M3 extraction could be recommended. Although DI may affect bone regeneration during the early healing period, further study is required to elucidate any possible factors associated with the healing process. The DI does not cause any long-term adverse effects on bone regeneration after surgical extraction.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spontaneous bone regeneration after surgical extraction of a horizontally impacted mandibular third molar: a retrospective panoramic radiograph analysis
    Eugene Kim
    Mi Young Eo
    Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen
    Hoon Joo Yang
    Hoon Myoung
    Soung Min Kim
    Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 41
  • [2] Periodontal status of the adjacent second molar after impacted mandibular third molar surgical extraction
    Thuy Anh Vu Pham
    Nam Hoang Nguyen
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL DENTISTRY, 2019, 10 (02) : 311 - 318
  • [3] Mandibular Second Molar Periodontal Healing After Impacted Third Molar Extraction in Young Adults
    Inocencio Faria, Ana
    Gallas-Torreira, Mercedes
    Lopez-Raton, Monica
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 70 (12) : 2732 - 2741
  • [4] Evaluation of the Effect of Surgical Extraction of an Impacted Mandibular Third Molar on the Periodontal Status of the Second Molar-Prospective Study
    Aniko-Wlodarczyk, Magda
    Jaron, Aleksandra
    Preuss, Olga
    Grzywacz, Anna
    Trybek, Grzegorz
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (12)
  • [5] A comparative study of platelet-rich plasma, hydroxyapatite, demineralized bone matrix and autologous bone to promote bone regeneration after mandibular impacted third molar extraction
    Arenaz-Bua, Jorge
    Luaces-Rey, Ramon
    Sironvalle-Soliva, Sheila
    Patino-Seijas, Beatriz
    Garcia-Rozado, Alvaro
    Martin-Sastre, Roberto
    Ferreras-Granados, Jose
    Lorenzo-Franco, Fernanda
    Vazquez-Mahia, Ines
    Lopez-Cedrun, Jose-Luis
    MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL, 2010, 15 (03): : E483 - E489
  • [6] Assessment of Electrosensitivity of the Pulp of the Mandibular Second Molar after Surgical Removal of an Impacted Mandibular Third Molar
    Trybek, Grzegorz
    Aniko-Wlodarczyk, Magda
    Preuss, Olga
    Jaron, Aleksandra
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (16)
  • [7] Autogenous bone grafting for treatment of osseous defect after impacted mandibular third molar extraction: A randomized controlled trial
    Ge, Jing
    Yang, Chi
    Zheng, Jiawei
    Hu, Yingkai
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (03) : 572 - 580
  • [8] Radiological findings associated with postoperative wound infection after extraction of impacted mandibular third molar: A retrospective study
    Yamamura, Makiko
    Ishii, Shigeru
    Akiyama, Shingo
    Akiyama, Hiroki
    Nagumo, Tatsuhito
    Koeda, Satoko
    Kinuta, Mikihisa
    Nakamura, Makiko
    Nishikubo, Shuichi
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (05)
  • [9] Periodontal status of mandibular second molar after extraction of impacted mandibular third molars- a prospective clinical trial
    Singh, Swathi
    Gottumukkala, Sruthima Naga Venkata Satya
    Ramesh, Konathala Santosh Venkata
    Penmetsa, Gautami Subhadra
    Dwarakanath, Chinnaswami Doraiswami
    Bypalli, Vivek
    EUROPEAN ORAL RESEARCH, 2022, 56 (03) : 110 - 116
  • [10] Factors associated with spontaneous mesialization of impacted mandibular third molars after second molar protraction
    Baik, Un-Bong
    Kang, Jin Hye
    Lee, Ui-Lyong
    Vaid, Nikhilesh R.
    Kim, Yoon-Ji
    Lee, Dong-Yul
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2020, 90 (02) : 181 - 186