Can the Web-Form WHOQOL-BREF be an Alternative to the Paper-Form?

被引:17
作者
Chen, Wen-Ching [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Jung-Der [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Hwang, Jing-Shiang [6 ]
Chen, Chiao-Chicy [7 ]
Wu, Chia-Huei [1 ]
Yao, Grace [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Psychol, Coll Sci, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Inst Occupat Med & Ind Hyg, Coll Publ Hlth, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
[3] Yuli Hosp, Dept Hlth, Executive Yuan, Taiwan
[4] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Hosp, Dept Environm & Occupat Med, Taipei 100, Taiwan
[6] Acad Sinica, Inst Stat Sci, Taipei 11529, Taiwan
[7] Taipei City Hosp, Song De Branch, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Comparison; Reliability; Validity; Web version; WHOQOL-BREF; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; PERCEIVED STRESS; PENCIL; INTERNET; QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDITY; TAIWAN; RELIABILITY; VALIDATION; INSTRUMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s11205-008-9355-z
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to test whether the web version is an alternative to the paper version of the short version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-BREF). Two studies were conducted. Study 1 used crossover self-controlled trials with 80 participants to compare the web and paper versions and to determine the test-retest reliability of the web version. Study 2 used data from 1,016 web participants to analyze the internal consistency and concurrent and construct validity of the web version. The correlations of domain scores between the web and paper versions ranged from 0.71 to 0.85. Dependent t tests showed no significant differences in domain scores between these two versions. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) for test-retest reliability of web version ranged from 0.79 to 0.91. The Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.60 to 0.83. Multiple regression models indicated that the web version has good concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) for the second-order hierarchical factor model also supported the construct validity of the web version. The web version of the WHOQOL-BREF can be the alternative to the paper version for health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:97 / 114
页数:18
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Introduction, Administration, Scoring and Generic Version of the assessment
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, TESTING STRUCTURAL E
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Redefining Healthcare: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, Qual Life Res
[5]  
BENTLER PM, 1990, PSYCHOL BULL, V107, P238, DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   Electronic collection of health-related quality of life data: Validity, time benefits, and patient preference [J].
Bliven, BD ;
Kaufman, SE ;
Spertus, JA .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2001, 10 (01) :15-21
[8]   Development, feasibility and compliance of a web-based system for very frequent QOL and symptom home self-assessment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [J].
Bush, N ;
Donaldson, G ;
Moinpour, C ;
Haberman, M ;
Milliken, D ;
Markle, V ;
Lauson, J .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (01) :77-93
[9]   Validation of electronic data capture of the irritable bowel syndrome - Quality of life measure, the work productivity and activity impairment questionnaire for irritable bowel syndrome and the EuroQol [J].
Bushnell, DM ;
Reilly, MC ;
Galani, C ;
Martin, ML ;
Ricci, JF ;
Patrick, DL ;
McBurney, CR .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2006, 9 (02) :98-105
[10]   Internet vs. paper and pencil administration of questionnaires commonly used in panic/agoraphobia research [J].
Carlbring, Per ;
Brunt, Sara ;
Bohman, Susanne ;
Austin, David ;
Richards, Jeffrey ;
Ost, Lars-Goran ;
Andersson, Gerhard .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2007, 23 (03) :1421-1434