Finite element analysis of the strain distribution in the humeral head tubercles during abduction: comparison of young and osteoporotic bone

被引:32
作者
Clavert, Ph.
Zerah, M.
Krier, J.
Mille, P.
Kempf, J. F.
Kahn, J. L.
机构
[1] Fac Med, Inst Normal Anat, Biomech Lab GEBOAS, F-67085 Strasbourg, France
[2] INSA Strasbourg, LGECCO, LISS,Strasbourg Grp, Lab Ingn Surface, F-67084 Strasbourg, France
关键词
shoulder; humerus; finite element analysis; stress distribution; biomechanics;
D O I
10.1007/s00276-006-0140-x
中图分类号
R602 [外科病理学、解剖学]; R32 [人体形态学];
学科分类号
100101 ;
摘要
Aim The aim of this work was to design an accurate 3D digital model of the humerus and rotator cuff muscles. This model was then used to study strain distribution in humeral tubercles according to bone density. Materials and methods The geometry of bone and muscle structures was reproduced using SURFDRIVER(C) software, based on anatomical sections, CT scans and MRI images from the Visible Human Project image library. The contours were transferred to PATRAN(C) software to rebuild volumes and mesh them. Calculations of strains and their distribution were performed using NASTRAN(C) software. All the elements were considered to be isotropes. Results The study of the distribution of stress magnitude according to the type of bone modeled, shows that some stresses in cortical bone are greater than those in cancellous bone and are also greater in old bone, implying more deformation in old bone at constant force. This study also shows that stresses do not penetrate deeply into cancellous tissue. Conclusion Observing the simulation results led understanding of the pathology of certain fractures of the proximal end of the humerus. This study also helped explain why certain types of osteosynthesis fail due to tubercles reconstruction failures.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 587
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Glenoid cancellous bone strength and modulus [J].
Anglin, C ;
Tolhurst, P ;
Wyss, UP ;
Pichora, DR .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1999, 32 (10) :1091-1097
[2]  
BAREA C, 1998, THESIS U P SABATIER
[3]  
BAREA C, 1998, 11 C ESB TOUL, P27
[4]   Biomechanics of the deltoideus [J].
Billuart, F ;
Gagey, O ;
Skalli, W ;
Mitton, D .
SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2006, 28 (01) :76-81
[5]   Tensile experiments and SEM fractography on bovine subchondral bone [J].
Braidotti, P ;
Bemporad, E ;
D'Alessio, T ;
Sciuto, SA ;
Stagni, L .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 33 (09) :1153-1157
[6]   A finite element model of the shoulder:: application to the comparison of normal and osteoarthritic joints [J].
Büchler, P ;
Ramaniraka, NA ;
Rakotomanana, LR ;
Iannotti, JP ;
Farron, A .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (9-10) :630-639
[7]   Finite element analysis of the mechanical behavior of a scapula implanted with a glenoid prosthesis [J].
Couteau, B ;
Mansat, P ;
Estivalèzes, É ;
Darmana, R ;
Mansat, M ;
Egan, J .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 16 (07) :566-575
[8]   Bone strength and material properties of the glenoid [J].
Frich, LH ;
Jensen, NC ;
Odgaard, A ;
Pedersen, CM ;
Sojbjerg, JO ;
Dalstra, M .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 1997, 6 (02) :97-104
[9]  
Friedman R J, 1992, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V1, P261, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80068-2
[10]  
FROST HM, 1987, BONE MINER, V2, P73