Comparison among the perforation rates of Maloney, balloon, and Savary dilation of esophageal strictures

被引:130
作者
Hernandez, LJ [1 ]
Jacobson, JW [1 ]
Harris, MS [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Med, Sinai Samaritan Med Ctr, Dept Med,Sect Gastroenterol, Milwaukee, WI 53233 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-5107(00)70448-2
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditionally, mercury-filled rubber bougies are used for dilation of simple or mild-to-moderate esophageal strictures, whereas through-the-scope balloon dilators and wire-guided polyvinyl bougies have become standard for more complex strictures. Because few comparative trials are available, the choice of dilator and technique is largely based on the training and experience of the operator. Methods: We reviewed 348 esophageal dilation procedures performed on a total of 142 patients over a 4-year period (January 1, 1993, to January 1, 1997). The location and cause of stricture, the maximum diameter of the instrument used per session, the rate of perforation, and the rate of fluoroscopy use were recorded. Results: Maloney, balloon (hydrostatic and pneumatic type), and Savary dilations were performed in 102, 156, and 90 sessions, respectively. Perforations occurred in 4 patients. All of these perforations occurred when Maloney dilators were passed blindly into complex strictures (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.011, two-tailed). Three of these four patients had undergone endoscopy with conscious sedation immediately before the dilation. The immediate outcome of surgery was good in all 4 patients with no deaths. Conclusion: Perforation was most commonly associated with the blind passage of Maloney bougies into complex strictures.
引用
收藏
页码:460 / 462
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 1998, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V48, P702
  • [2] LONG-TERM RESULTS OF ENDOSCOPIC DILATATION FOR CORROSIVE ESOPHAGEAL STRICTURES
    BROOR, SL
    RAJU, GS
    BOSE, PP
    LAHOTI, D
    RAMESH, GN
    KUMAR, A
    SOOD, GK
    [J]. GUT, 1993, 34 (11) : 1498 - 1501
  • [3] KOZAREK RA, 1995, TXB GASTROENTEROLOGY, P2954
  • [4] Does fluoroscopic guidance for Maloney esophageal dilation impact on the clinical endpoint of therapy: Relief of dysphagia and achievement of luminal patency
    McClave, SA
    Brady, PG
    Wright, RA
    Goldschmid, S
    Minocha, A
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (02) : 93 - 97
  • [5] PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY OF MALONEY ESOPHAGEAL DILATION BLINDED VERSUS FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE
    MCCLAVE, SA
    WRIGHT, RA
    BRADY, PG
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1990, 36 (03) : 272 - 275
  • [6] Nostrant T T, 1998, Gastroenterologist, V6, P5
  • [7] SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM OUTCOME OF ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION
    SAWYER, R
    PHILLIPS, C
    VAKIL, N
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1995, 41 (02) : 130 - 134
  • [8] ENDOSCOPIC COMPLICATIONS - RESULTS OF 1974 AMERICAN-SOCIETY-FOR-GASTROINTESTINAL-ENDOSCOPY SURVEY
    SILVIS, SE
    NEBEL, O
    ROGERS, G
    SUGAWA, C
    MANDELSTAM, P
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 235 (09): : 928 - 930
  • [9] TUCKER LE, 1992, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V87, P1709
  • [10] VANDAM J, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V71, P2910, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930515)71:10<2910::AID-CNCR2820711005>3.0.CO