Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury in women having a vaginal birth after a previous caesarean section: A population-based cohort study

被引:17
作者
Jardine, Jennifer E. [1 ,2 ]
Knight, Hannah E. [1 ,2 ]
Carroll, Fran E. [1 ]
Gurol-Urganci, Ipek [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Royal Coll Obstetricians & Gynaecologists, Lindsey Stewart Ctr, 27 Sussex Pl, London NW1 4RG, England
[2] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Publ Hlth & Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Pl, London WC1H 9SH, England
关键词
OASI; Third and fourth degree tear; VBAC; DELIVERY; TRIAL; LABOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.02.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: Caesarean section is increasing in prevalence and with it the proportion of women going into their next pregnancy with a scar on their uterus. For women considering vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC), accurate information about the associated risks is required. Study design: The cohort comprised 192,057 women who had a vaginal delivery of a singleton, term, cephalic infant between the 1st April 2013 and the 31st March 2014 in England: 182,064 women who were having their first baby, and 9993 women who were having a second baby after a previous caesarean delivery. Their risk of an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) was compared using a mixed-effects logistic regression model, adjusting for maternal age, use of instrument, episiotomy, prolonged labour, shoulder dystocia, and demographic factors. Results: The OASI rate was 5.0% in primiparous women, 5.8% in secondiparous women undergoing VBAC after previous elective caesarean, and 7.6% in secondiparous women undergoing VBAC after previous emergency caesarean. Women having a VBAC for their second baby following an emergency caesarean section in their first delivery had a higher rate of OASI than primiparous women (adjusted OR 1.31; 95% CI: 1.20, 1.43), For women with a previous elective delivery, the rates are similar to those for primiparous women. Conclusion: Women having a VBAC after emergency caesarean have a higher rate of OASI than primiparous women. This is important in the counselling of women considering VBAC. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 13
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Obstet Gynecol, V116, P450, DOI 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181eeb251
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2012, International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision
[3]   Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation of Exposure Odds Ratios in Complete Records Logistic Regression [J].
Bartlett, Jonathan W. ;
Harel, Ofer ;
Carpenter, James R. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 182 (08) :730-736
[4]   Maternal Body Mass Index and Risk of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury [J].
Blomberg, Marie .
BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
[5]  
Carroll F, 2019, PATTERNS MATERNITY C
[6]   Parity derived for pregnant women using historical administrative hospital data: Accuracy varied among patient groups [J].
Cromwell, David. A. ;
Knight, Hannah. E. ;
Gurol-Urganci, Ipek .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (05) :578-585
[7]  
Department of Health, 2007, NHS MAT STAT ENGL 19
[8]  
Digital N, 2018, NHS CLASS OPCD 4
[9]   Birth position and obstetric anal sphincter injury: a population-based study of 113 000 spontaneous births [J].
Elvander, Charlotte ;
Ahlberg, Mia ;
Thies-Lagergren, Li ;
Cnattingius, Sven ;
Stephansson, Olof .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
[10]   Risk factors for 3rd and 4th degree perineal tear [J].
Eskandar, O. ;
Shet, D. .
JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2009, 29 (02) :119-122