Identifying recreational ecosystem service areas of concern in Grand Canyon National Park: A participatory mapping approach

被引:11
作者
Rice, William L. [1 ,2 ]
Taff, B. Derrick [3 ]
Newman, Peter [3 ]
Zipp, Katherine Y. [4 ]
Pan, Bing [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montana, Parks Tourism & Recreat Management Program, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[2] Univ Montana, Dept Soc & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Recreat Pk & Tourism Management, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Penn State Univ, Dept Agr Econ Sociol & Educ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
关键词
MIXED METHODS; SPATIAL DATA; VISITOR USE; FRAMEWORK; PPGIS; GIS; LANDSCAPE; ZONES;
D O I
10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102353
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Increased visitor use and overuse are well-documented in popular national parks in the Western United States. Previous research has documented how this high level of visitor use negatively impacts park resources and inhibits the provisioning of recreational ecosystem services to park visitors. This research informs the management of recreational ecosystem services in wildland protected areas by identifying important provisioning areas, degraded provisioning areas, and at-risk provisioning areas through a participatory mapping exercise conducted with park managers and other key residential stakeholders (e.g., tourism operators, NGOs, and local community leaders) in Grand Canyon National Park. Following a mixed methods design, responses were analyzed via overlap, hotspot, and qualitative metadata analyses. Findings indicate that unique bundles of recreational ecosystem services are provisioned in specific areas across the study area. However, many of these service provisioning areas were also found to be either degraded or at-risk of degradation due to visitor use trends. Based on perceived service provisioning and degradation, areas of concern for recreational ecosystem service management were subsequently classified. Finally, sources and impacts of degradation for areas of concern were identified through a paired qualitative analysis of the spatial participatory mapping data. As a result, this manuscript outlines a new method of prioritizing areas for recreational ecosystem service management through an areas of concern analysis that examines the overlap of service provisioning areas and ecological and experiential degradation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Social-ecological hotspots mapping: A spatial approach for identifying coupled social-ecological space [J].
Alessa, Lilian ;
Kliskey, Andrew ;
Brown, Gregory .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2008, 85 (01) :27-39
[2]  
Ament J. M., 2017, Conservation Letters, V10, P439
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, EC HUM WELL BEING SY
[4]   Cultural ecosystem services trade-offs arising from agriculturization in Argentina: A case study in Mar Chiquita Basin [J].
Auer, Alejandra ;
Nahuelhual, Laura ;
Maceira, Nestor .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2018, 91 :45-54
[5]  
Backlund E.A., 2006, BACKCOUNTRY DAY HIKE
[6]  
Bodin M., 2014, PLANNING, V80, P10
[7]   Mapping place values: 10 lessons from two decades of public participation GIS empirical research [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Reed, Pat ;
Raymond, Christopher M. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2020, 116
[8]   Mixed methods participatory GIS: An evaluation of the validity of qualitative and quantitative mapping methods [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Strickland-Munro, Jennifer ;
Kobryn, Halina ;
Moore, Susan A. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2017, 79 :153-166
[9]   Is PPGIS good enough? An empirical evaluation of the quality of PPGIS crowd-sourced spatial data for conservation planning [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Weber, Delene ;
de Bie, Kelly .
LAND USE POLICY, 2015, 43 :228-238
[10]   Key issues and research priorities for public participation GIS (PPGIS): A synthesis based on empirical research [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Kytta, Marketta .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 46 :122-136