Role of risk preferences in explaining the public's willingness to pay for marine turtle conservation in China

被引:6
作者
Jin, Jianjun [1 ,2 ]
He, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Gong, Haozhou [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Wenyu [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, State Key Lab Earth Surface Proc & Resource Ecol, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Nat Resources, Fac Geog Sci, Beijing 100875, Peoples R China
关键词
Risk preferences; Willingness to pay; Marine turtle conservation; China; CONTINGENT VALUATION; TIME; UNCERTAINTY; ATTITUDES; AVERSION; ADOPTION; FARMERS; POLICY; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.04.006
中图分类号
P7 [海洋学];
学科分类号
0707 ;
摘要
This study examines the role of risk preferences in explaining the public's willingness to pay for marine turtle conservation in China. Respondents (n = 218) were randomly selected from eight districts in Beijing. They were interviewed in person and participated in a risk experiment. The results show that residents in Beijing had some knowledge about marine turtles. The typical respondent in Beijing is risk averse. We found that the risk preferences of individuals have significant effects on their willingness to pay for marine turtle conservation. Risk taking respondents are more likely to support the marine turtle conservation program. Results also indicate that increases in the bid value, household income levels, years of education and participation in public environmental issues have significant effects on the public's acceptance of marine turtle conservation. The findings of this study can help resource managers and/or policy makers to improve the conservation of marine turtles in China.
引用
收藏
页码:52 / 57
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, IFPRI DISCUSSION PAP
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, MEASUREMENT ENV RESO
[3]  
[Anonymous], SHAN HAI JING
[4]   The net benefit of saving the Asian elephant: a policy and contingent valuation study [J].
Bandara, R ;
Tisdell, C .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2004, 48 (01) :93-107
[5]   The adoption of switchgrass and miscanthus by farmers: Impact of liquidity constraints and risk preferences [J].
Bocqueho, G. ;
Jacquet, F. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (05) :2598-2607
[6]   Risk Aversion: Experimental Evidence from South African Fishing Communities [J].
Brick, Kerri ;
Visser, Martine ;
Burns, Justine .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 94 (01) :133-152
[7]   The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Hogarth, RM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :7-42
[8]   A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota [J].
Chambers, CM ;
Whitehead, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 26 (02) :249-267
[9]  
Chan SKF, 2007, CHELONIAN CONSERV BI, V6, P185, DOI 10.2744/1071-8443(2007)6[185:ACOOTP]2.0.CO
[10]  
2