Shortwave radiative closure studies for clear skies during the atmospheric radiation measurement 2003 aerosol intensive observation period

被引:78
作者
Michalsky, J. J. [1 ]
Anderson, G. P.
Barnard, J.
Delamere, J.
Gueymard, C.
Kato, S.
Kiedron, P.
McComiskey, A.
Ricchiazzi, P.
机构
[1] NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[2] USAF, Res Lab, Battlespace Surveillance Innovat Ctr, Boulder, CO 80305 USA
[3] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[4] Atmospher & Environm Res Inc, Lexington, MA 02421 USA
[5] Solar Consulting Serv Inc, Colebrook, NH 03576 USA
[6] Hampton Univ, Ctr Atmospher Sci, Hampton, VA 23668 USA
[7] SUNY Albany, Atmospher Sci Res Ctr, Albany, NY 12222 USA
[8] Univ Colorado, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[9] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Computat Earth Syst Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1029/2005JD006341
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[ 1] The Department of Energy's Atmospheric Radiation Measurement ( ARM) program sponsored a large aerosol intensive observation period (AIOP) to study aerosol during the month of May 2003 around the Southern Great Plains (SGP) Climate Research Facility (CRF) in north central Oklahoma. Redundant measurements of aerosol optical properties were made using different techniques at the surface as well as in vertical profile with sensors aboard two aircraft. One of the principal motivations for this experiment was to resolve the disagreement between models and measurements of diffuse horizontal broadband shortwave irradiance at the surface, especially for modest aerosol loading. This paper focuses on using the redundant aerosol and radiation measurements during this AIOP to compare direct beam and diffuse horizontal broadband shortwave irradiance measurements and models at the surface for a wide range of aerosol cases that occurred during 30 clear-sky periods on 13 days of May 2003. Models and measurements are compared over a large range of solar-zenith angles. Six different models are used to assess the relative agreement among them and the measurements. Better agreement than previously achieved appears to be the result of better specification of input parameters and better measurements of irradiances than in prior studies. Biases between modeled and measured direct irradiances are in the worst case 1%, and biases between modeled and measured diffuse irradiances are less than 1.9%.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   MODTRAN4: radiative transfer modeling for remote sensing [J].
Anderson, GP ;
Berk, A ;
Acharya, PK ;
Matthew, MW ;
Bernstein, LS ;
Chetwynd, JH ;
Dothe, H ;
Adler-Golden, SM ;
Ratkowski, AJ ;
Felde, GW ;
Gardner, JA ;
Hoke, ML ;
Richtsmeier, SC ;
Pukall, B ;
Mello, J ;
Jeong, LS .
ALGORITHMS FOR MULTISPECTRAL, HYPERSPECTRAL, AND ULTRASPECTRAL IMAGERY VI, 2000, 4049 :176-183
[2]   `Comparison of methods for deriving aerosol asymmetry parameter [J].
Andrews, E ;
Sheridan, PJ ;
Fiebig, M ;
McComiskey, A ;
Ogren, JA ;
Arnott, P ;
Covert, D ;
Elleman, R ;
Gasparini, R ;
Collins, D ;
Jonsson, H ;
Schmid, B ;
Wang, J .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D5)
[3]   In situ aerosol profiles over the Southern Great Plains cloud and radiation test bed site: 1. Aerosol optical properties [J].
Andrews, E ;
Sheridan, PJ ;
Ogren, JA ;
Ferrare, R .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D6)
[4]   A comparison between modeled and measured clear-sky radiative shortwave fluxes in Arctic environments, with special emphasis on diffuse radiation [J].
Barnard, JC ;
Powell, DM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2002, 107 (D19) :ACL9-1
[5]  
Bush BC, 2000, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V17, P165, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2000)017<0165:COTEIP>2.0.CO
[6]  
2
[7]   Atmospheric radiative transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes [J].
Clough, SA ;
Shephard, MW ;
Mlawer, E ;
Delamere, JS ;
Iacono, M ;
Cady-Pereira, K ;
Boukabara, S ;
Brown, PD .
JOURNAL OF QUANTITATIVE SPECTROSCOPY & RADIATIVE TRANSFER, 2005, 91 (02) :233-244
[8]  
Clough SA, 1980, ATMOSPHERIC WATER VA, P25
[9]  
d'Almeida G.A., 1991, ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS
[10]  
Dutton EG, 2001, J ATMOS OCEAN TECH, V18, P297, DOI 10.1175/1520-0426(2001)018<0297:MOBDSI>2.0.CO