Hydraulic fracture propagation in naturally fractured reservoirs: Complex fracture or fracture networks

被引:147
作者
Wang, HanYi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Petr & Geosyst Engn Dept, Austin, TX 78712 USA
关键词
Hydraulic fracturing; Natural fracture; Complex fracture; Fracture networks; Stimulated reservoir volume (SRV); Cohesive zone method (CZM); SHALE-GAS-PRODUCTION; NUMERICAL-SIMULATION; BRITTLE; ELEMENT; MODEL; BASIN; STIMULATION; MECHANISMS; CRITERION; ROCKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jngse.2019.102911
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
All reservoirs are fractured to some degree. Depending on the density, dimension, orientation and the cementation of natural fractures and the location where the hydraulic fracturing is executed, pre-existing natural fractures can impact hydraulic fracture propagation and the associated flow capacity. Understanding the interactions between hydraulic fracture and natural fractures is crucial in estimating fracture complexity, stimulated reservoir volume (SRV), drained reservoir volume (DRV) and completion efficiency. However, what hydraulic fracture looks like in the subsurface, especially in unconventional reservoirs, remain elusive, and many times, field observations contradict our common beliefs. In this study, a global cohesive zone model is presented to investigate hydraulic propagation in naturally fractured reservoirs, along with a comprehensive discussion on hydraulic fracture propagation behaviors in naturally fractured reservoirs. The results indicate that in naturally fractured reservoirs, hydraulic fracture can turn, kink, branch and coalesce, and the fracture propagation path is quite complex, but it does not necessarily mean that fracture networks can be created, even under low horizontal stress difference, because of strong stress shadow effect and flow-resistance dependent fluid distribution. Perhaps, 'complex fracture', rather than 'fracture networks', is the norm in most unconventional reservoirs.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Acuna JA, 2016, UNC RES TECHN C SAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Reservoir Geomechanics, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511586477
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1653 US GEOL SURV US
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 44 US ROCK MECH S 5
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2018, SHOCK VIB, DOI [DOI 10.1155/2018/2748408, 10.1155/2018/2748408]
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2015, SOC PETR ENG SPE HYD, DOI DOI 10.2118/173353-MS
[7]  
Barenblatt G., 1959, APPL MATH MECH-ENGL, V23, P622, DOI 10.1016/0021-8928(59)90157-1
[8]  
Barenblatt G. I., 1962, ADV APPL MECH, V7, P55, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2, 10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70121-2]
[9]   Application of the Fully Coupled Planar 3D Poroelastic Hydraulic Fracturing Model to the Analysis of the Permeability Contrast Impact on Fracture Propagation [J].
Baykin, A. N. ;
Golovin, S. V. .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 2018, 51 (10) :3205-3217
[10]   General theory of three-dimensional consolidation [J].
Biot, MA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 1941, 12 (02) :155-164