Determining the minimally important difference for the Oral Health Impact Profile-20

被引:52
作者
Allen, P. Finbarr [1 ]
O'Sullivan, Maeve [1 ]
Locker, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Cork Univ, Dent Sch & Hosp, Dept Restorat Dent, Cork, Ireland
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Community Dent Hlth Serv Res Unit, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
oral health-related quality of life; partial dentures; responsiveness; minimally important difference; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; RESPONSIVENESS; DENTURE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00610.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
In the context of clinical trials, measurement of change is critical. The aim of this study was to determine the minimally important difference (MID) for the Oral Health Impact Profile-20 (OHIP-20) when used with partially dentate patients undergoing treatment that included the provision of removable partial dentures. In a prospective clinical trial, 51 consecutive patients were provided with removable partial dentures. In addition to demographic and dental status data, patients completed an OHIP-20 prior to treatment. One month postoperatively, patients completed a post-treatment OHIP-20 and a global transition scale. Domains assessed in the global transition scale were appearance, ability to chew food, oral comfort, and speech. The MID for the OHIP-20 was calculated using the anchor-based approach. From the initial sample of 51 patients, 44 completed post-treatment questionnaires and were included in the analysis. Change scores in the four transition domains indicated that new dentures had a positive impact in the majority of subjects, especially in perceived impact on chewing and appearance. The study provided a guideline as to what constitutes the MID for the OHIP-20. This benchmark can be used when interpreting the impact of clinical intervention for replacing missing teeth and for power calculation in statistical analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 134
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Allen F, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P446
[2]  
ALLEN PF, 2008, BR DENT J, V12, P204
[3]   MEASURING CHANGE OVER TIME - ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF EVALUATIVE INSTRUMENTS [J].
GUYATT, G ;
WALTER, S ;
NORMAN, G .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (02) :171-178
[4]   MEASURING HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY-OF-LIFE [J].
GUYATT, GH ;
FEENY, DH ;
PATRICK, DL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1993, 118 (08) :622-629
[5]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415
[6]   THE INFLUENCE OF DENTURE DESIGN ON PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF PARTIAL DENTURES [J].
JEPSON, NJA ;
THOMASON, JM ;
STEELE, JG .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 1995, 178 (08) :296-300
[7]   DETERMINING A MINIMAL IMPORTANT CHANGE IN A DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
JUNIPER, EF ;
GUYATT, GH ;
WILLAN, A ;
GRIFFITH, LE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (01) :81-87
[8]   Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health-related quality of life [J].
Locker, D ;
Jokovic, A ;
Clarke, M .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 32 (01) :10-18
[9]   Issues in measuring change in self-perceived oral health status [J].
Locker, D .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 26 (01) :41-47
[10]   What do measures of 'oral health-related quality of life' measure? [J].
Locker, David ;
Allen, Finbarr .
COMMUNITY DENTISTRY AND ORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 35 (06) :401-411