Study on Improved Expert PID Controller Based on PSO Algorithm for Maglev Transportation System with Time Delay

被引:0
作者
Song, Rong-rong [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Zi-li [3 ]
Ma, Wei-hua [4 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Coll Elect Engn, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Southwest Univ Nationality, Coll Comp Sci & Technol, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Coll Maths, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[4] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Tract Power State Key Lab, Chengdu 610031, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MECHANICAL DESIGN, MANUFACTURE AND AUTOMATION ENGINEERING (MDMAE 2014) | 2014年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Maglev transportation system; Expert PID control; PSO algorithm; Time delay; MATLAB simulation; NONAUTONOMOUS SYSTEM; FEEDBACK-CONTROL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Time delay is one of the most important aspects of the suspension control performance impact in maglev transportation system (MTS). By using the traditional PID control, the problem is that it is difficult to confirm the PID parameters and have long settling time, even appear the chaotic phenomenon. However, using Expert PID (EPID) control method produced over-fitting to initial assignments, local optimum induced easily and slow convergence rate problem. Based on the global optimization feature of PSO algorithm, it has been adopted to optimize the initial values of Expert PID control in this paper. An intelligent control algorithm for the maglev transportation system was put forward based on Expert PID optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (EPID-PSO). The expert rule is that if the absolute value of the error trended to decrease, the PID current control kept its maintenance; if not, then the PID current control applied strong functions. Under this rule, the dynamic error is reduced, and the performance of time delay is improved. Simulation results by MATLAB proved that the control scheme compared with EPID control and PSO-PID control has good robustness, shorter adjustment time, faster response time, achieving better quality of control.
引用
收藏
页码:230 / 234
页数:5
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Forced phase-locked response of a nonlinear system with time delay after Hopf bifurcation [J].
Ji, JC ;
Hansen, CH .
CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2005, 25 (02) :461-473
[2]   Adaptive Sliding-Mode Control for Nonlinear Active Suspension Vehicle Systems Using T-S Fuzzy Approach [J].
Li, Hongyi ;
Yu, Jinyong ;
Hilton, Chris ;
Liu, Honghai .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, 2013, 60 (08) :3328-3338
[3]   Sub-harmonic resonances of the non-autonomous system with delayed position feedback control [J].
Wang Hong-Po ;
Jie, Li .
ACTA PHYSICA SINICA, 2007, 56 (05) :2504-2516
[4]   Sup-resonant response of a nonautonomous maglev system with delayed acceleration feedback control [J].
Wang, Hongpo ;
Li, He ;
Zhang, Kun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2008, 44 (10) :2338-2350
[5]   Delay-induced bifurcations in a nonautonomous system with delayed velocity feedbacks [J].
Xu, J ;
Yu, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIFURCATION AND CHAOS, 2004, 14 (08) :2777-2798