Standardized Six-Step Approach to the Performance of the Focused Basic Obstetric Ultrasound Examination

被引:13
作者
Abuhamad, Alfred [1 ]
Zhao, Yili [1 ]
Abuhamad, Sharon [1 ]
Sinkovskaya, Elena [1 ]
Rao, Rashmi [2 ]
Kanaan, Camille [1 ]
Platt, Lawrence [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Norfolk, VA 23507 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Ctr Fetal Med & Womens Ultrasound, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
six-step approach; focused basic obstetric ultrasound; limited resource settings; fetus; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1055/s-0035-1558828
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives This study aims to validate the feasibility and accuracy of a new standardized six-step approach to the performance of the focused basic obstetric ultrasound examination, and compare the new approach to the regular approach performed in the scheduled obstetric ultrasound examination. Study Design A new standardized six-step approach to the performance of the focused basic obstetric ultrasound examination, to evaluate fetal presentation, fetal cardiac activity, presence of multiple pregnancy, placental localization, amniotic fluid volume evaluation, and biometric measurements, was prospectively performed on 100 pregnant women between 18(+0) and 27(+6) weeks of gestation and another 100 pregnant women between 28(+0) and 36(+6) weeks of gestation. The agreement of findings for each of the six steps of the standardized six-step approach was evaluated against the regular approach. Results In all ultrasound examinations performed, substantial to perfect agreement (Kappa value between 0.64 and 1.00) was observed between the new standardized six-step approach and the regular approach. Conclusion The new standardized six-step approach to the focused basic obstetric ultrasound examination can be performed successfully and accurately between 18(+0) and 36(+6) weeks of gestation. This standardized approach can be of significant benefit to limited resource settings and in point of care obstetric ultrasound applications.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 98
页数:9
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Abuhamad A, 2014, ULTRASOUND OBST GYN, P186
[2]   Ultrasound Outreach and the Crisis in Haiti [J].
Abuhamad, Alfred Z. .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (04) :673-677
[3]  
American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2013, J Ultrasound Med, V32, P1083, DOI 10.7863/ultra.32.6.1083
[4]   Obstetric ultrasound scanning by local health workers in a refugee camp on the Thai-Burmese border [J].
Rijken, M. J. ;
Lee, S. J. ;
Boel, M. E. ;
Papageorghiou, A. T. ;
Visser, G. H. A. ;
Dwell, S. L. M. ;
Kennedy, S. H. ;
Singhasivanon, P. ;
White, N. J. ;
Nosten, F. ;
McGready, R. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 34 (04) :395-403
[5]   Impact of the introduction of ultrasound services in a limited resource setting: rural Rwanda 2008 [J].
Shah, Sachita P. ;
Epino, Henry ;
Bukhman, Gene ;
Umulisa, Irenee ;
Dushimiyimana, J. M. V. ;
Reichman, Andrew ;
Noble, Vicki E. .
BMC INTERNATIONAL HEALTH AND HUMAN RIGHTS, 2009, 9
[6]  
Sippel S, 2011, INT J EMERG MED, V4, DOI 10.1186/1865-1380-4-72
[7]   The diagnostic impact of limited, screening obstetric ultrasound when performed by midwives in rural Uganda [J].
Swanson, J. O. ;
Kawooya, M. G. ;
Swanson, D. L. ;
Hippe, D. S. ;
Dungu-Matovu, P. ;
Nathan, R. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 34 (07) :508-512
[8]  
World Health Organization Study Group, 1998, WHO TECH REP SER, V875, P46
[9]   Optimal caliper placement: manual vs automated methods [J].
Yazdi, B. ;
Zanker, P. ;
Wagner, P. ;
Sonek, J. ;
Pintoffl, K. ;
Hoopmann, M. ;
Kagan, K. O. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 43 (02) :170-175