A cash effect in ultimatum game experiments

被引:9
作者
Shen, Junyi [1 ]
Takahashi, Hiromasa [2 ]
机构
[1] Kobe Univ, Res Inst Econ & Business Adm, Kobe, Hyogo 6578501, Japan
[2] Hiroshima City Univ, Fac Int Studies, Hiroshima, Japan
来源
JOURNAL OF SOCIO-ECONOMICS | 2013年 / 47卷
关键词
Cash effect; Ultimatum game; Cost-loss discrepancy; Experimental design; LOSS AVERSION; BEHAVIOR; DICTATOR; STAKES; FAIR;
D O I
10.1016/j.socec.2013.09.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper reports two experiments involving an ultimatum game, conducted in Japan. There were two treatments in each experiment, which we call the cash session and the point session. The cash session involves introducing cash into the procedure of the experiments. In other words, in a cash session, subjects made decisions while holding cash in their hands, versus having points or tokens as in most prior experiments. We found that, compared to the point sessions, proposers offered more and responders rejected less frequently in the cash sessions. This is evidence that a cash effect exists in ultimatum game experiments. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 102
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Interaction terms in logit and probit models
    Ai, CR
    Norton, EC
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) : 123 - 129
  • [2] Persuasion in experimental ultimatum games
    Andersson, Ola
    Galizzi, Matteo M.
    Hoppe, Tim
    Kranz, Sebastian
    van der Wiel, Karen
    Wengstrom, Erik
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2010, 108 (01) : 16 - 18
  • [3] ANONYMITY VERSUS PUNISHMENT IN ULTIMATUM BARGAINING
    BOLTON, GE
    ZWICK, R
    [J]. GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 1995, 10 (01) : 95 - 121
  • [4] Camerer C. F., 2011, Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction
  • [5] Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from Indonesia
    Cameron, LA
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 1999, 37 (01) : 47 - 59
  • [6] Information in ultimatum games: An experimental study
    Croson, RTA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1996, 30 (02) : 197 - 212
  • [7] Drichoutis A., 2013, 46906 MPRA
  • [8] Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games
    Eckel, CC
    Grossman, PJ
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2001, 39 (02) : 171 - 188
  • [9] On the nature of fair behavior
    Falk, A
    Fehr, E
    Fischbacher, U
    [J]. ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2003, 41 (01) : 20 - 26
  • [10] AN EXPERIMENTAL-ANALYSIS OF ULTIMATUM BARGAINING
    GUTH, W
    SCHMITTBERGER, R
    SCHWARZE, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1982, 3 (04) : 367 - 388