Repellency of Cinnamomum cassia bark compounds and cream containing cassia oil to Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) under laboratory and indoor conditions

被引:44
作者
Chang, Kyu-Sik
Tak, Jun-Hyung
Kim, Soon-Il
Lee, Won-Ja
Ahn, Young-Joon [1 ]
机构
[1] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Agr Biotechnol, Seoul 151921, South Korea
[2] Korea Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Seoul 122701, South Korea
关键词
natural mosquito repellent; Aedes aegypti; Cinnamomum cassia; cassia oil; cinnamaldehyde;
D O I
10.1002/ps.1268
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Patch and skin bioassays were used in laboratory and indoor tests to evaluate the repellency of (E)-cinnamaldehyde, identified in Cinnamomum cassia Blume bark and essential oil, and a cream containing 5% (w/w) cassia oil against Aedes aegypti (L.) females. Results were compared with those of a known C cassia compound cinnamyl alcohol, N,N-diethyl-m-toluamide (DEET) and two commercial repellents: MeiMei (R) cream containing citronella and geranium oils and Repellan S (R) aerosol containing 19% DEET. In patch bioassay tests with A. aegypti females, (E)-cinnamaldehyde at 0.153 mg cm(-2) and DEET at 0.051 mg cm(-2) provided 93 and 89% protection at 40 min after exposure. In skin bioassay tests, (E)-cinnamaldehyde at 0.051 mg cm(-2) and DEET at 0.025 mg cm(-2) provided 87 and 95% protection at 30 min after application. (E)-Cinnamaldehyde was significantly more effective than cinnamyl alcohol in both bioassays. In indoor tests with four human volunteers, 5% cassia oil cream provided 94, 83 and 61% protection against A. aegypti females exposed for 30, 50 and 70 min after application respectively. Cassia oil cream was a slightly less effective repellent than MeiMei cream. Repellan S aerosol provided 91% repellency at 120 min after application. Products containing cassia oil merit further study as potential repellents for the protection of humans and domestic animals from blood-feeding vectors and the diseases they transmit. (c) 2006 Society of Chemical Industry.
引用
收藏
页码:1032 / 1038
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Mosquito density, biting rate and cage size effects on repellent tests [J].
Barnard, DR ;
Posey, KH ;
Smith, D ;
Schreck, CE .
MEDICAL AND VETERINARY ENTOMOLOGY, 1998, 12 (01) :39-45
[2]  
BARNARD DR, 2000, WHOCDSWHOPESGCDPP200
[3]  
Brown A. W. A., 1983, Integrated mosquito control methodologies. Volume 1. Experience and components from conventional chemical control, P161
[4]   Insect repellents: An overview [J].
Brown, M ;
Hebert, AA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1997, 36 (02) :243-249
[5]  
Browne LB, 1997, CHEM CONTROL INSECT, P117
[6]  
*CDC, 1992, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V41, P545
[7]   RESPONSES OF ARTHROPOD NATURAL ENEMIES TO INSECTICIDES [J].
CROFT, BA ;
BROWN, AWA .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENTOMOLOGY, 1975, 20 :285-335
[8]  
Curtis C. F., 1990, Appropriate technology in vector control., P75
[9]  
Dua VK, 1996, J AM MOSQUITO CONTR, V12, P406
[10]   Comparative efficacy of insect repellents against mosquito bites [J].
Fradin, MS ;
Day, JF .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (01) :13-18