Initial Prehospital Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS) as a Predictor of Patient Outcomes

被引:11
作者
Crowe, Remle P. [1 ]
Bourn, Scott S. [1 ]
Fernandez, Antonio R. [1 ,2 ]
Myers, J. Brent [1 ]
机构
[1] ESO Inc, Austin, TX USA
[2] Univ North Carolina Chapel Hill, Sch Med, Dept Emergency Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
关键词
Emergency Medical Services; risk stratification; patient outcomes; prehospital; Subject Terms; Epidemiology; Risk Adjustment;
D O I
10.1080/10903127.2020.1862944
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: A standardized objective measure of prehospital patient risk of hospitalization or death is needed. The Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (REMS), a validated risk-stratification tool, has not been widely tested for prehospital use. This study's objective was to assess predictive characteristics of initial prehospital REMS for ED disposition and overall patient mortality. Methods: This retrospective analysis used linked prehospital and hospital data from the national ESO Data Collaborative. All 911 responses from 1/1/2019-12/31/2019 were included. REMS (0-26) was calculated using age and first prehospital values for: pulse rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and Glasgow Coma Scale. Non-transports, patients <18 and cardiac arrests prior to EMS arrival were excluded. The primary outcome was ED disposition, dichotomized to discharge versus admission, transfer, or death. The secondary outcome was overall survival to discharge (ED or inpatient). Transfers and records without inpatient disposition were excluded from the secondary analysis. Predictive ability was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC). Optimal REMS cut points were determined using test characteristic curves. Univariable logistic regression modeling was used to quantify the association between initial prehospital REMS and each outcome. Results: Of 579,505 eligible records, 94,640 (16%) were excluded due to missing data needed to calculate REMS. Overall, 62% (n = 298,223) of patients were discharged from the ED, 36% (n = 175,212) were admitted, 2% (n = 10,499) were transferred, and 0.2% (n = 931) died in the ED. A REMS of 5 or lower demonstrated optimal statistical prediction for ED discharge versus not discharged (admission/transfer/death) (AUROC: 0.68). Patients with initial prehospital REMS of 5 or lower showed a three-fold increase in odds of ED discharge (OR: 3.28, 95%CI: 3.24-3.32). Of the 457,226 patients included in overall mortality analysis, >98% (n = 450,112) survived. AUROC of initial prehospital REMS for overall mortality was 0.79. A score 7 or lower was statistically optimal for predicting survival. Initial prehospital REMS of 7 or lower was associated with a five-fold increase in odds of overall survival (OR:5.41, 95%CI:5.15-5.69). Conclusion: Initial prehospital REMS was predictive of ED disposition and overall patient mortality, suggesting value as a risk-stratification measure for EMS agencies, systems and researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:55 / 65
页数:11
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Evaluating clinical care in the prehospital setting: Is Rapid Emergency Medicine Score the missing metric of EMS?
    Alter, Scott M.
    Infinger, Allison
    Swanson, Doug
    Studnek, Jonathan R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2017, 35 (02) : 218 - 221
  • [2] Risk Adjustment Measures and Outcome Measures for Prehospital Trauma Research: Recommendations from the Emergency Medical Services Outcomes Project (EMSOP)
    Beskind, Daniel L.
    Keim, Samuel M.
    Spaite, Daniel W.
    Garrison, Herbert G.
    Lerner, E. Brooke
    Howse, David
    Maio, Ronald F.
    [J]. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2011, 18 (09) : 988 - 1000
  • [3] Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate?
    Bouzat, Pierre
    Legrand, Robin
    Gillois, Pierre
    Ageron, Francois-Xavier
    Brun, Julien
    Savary, Dominique
    Champly, Frederic
    Albaladejo, Pierre
    Payen, Jean-Francois
    [J]. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2016, 47 (01): : 14 - 18
  • [4] Evaluation and Comparison of Different Prehospital Triage Scores of Trauma Patients on In-Hospital Mortality
    Cassignol, Arnaud
    Markarian, Thibaut
    Cotte, Jean
    Marmin, Julien
    Nguyen, Cedric
    Cardinale, Mickael
    Pauly, Vanessa
    Kerbaul, Francois
    Meaudre, Eric
    Bobbia, Xavier
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2019, 23 (04) : 543 - 550
  • [5] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2020, EM TRIAG TREAT TRANS
  • [6] Predicting intensive care unit admission and death for COVID-19 patients in the emergency department using early warning scores
    Covino, Marcello
    Sandroni, Claudio
    Santoro, Michele
    Sabia, Luca
    Simeoni, Benedetta
    Bocci, Maria Grazia
    Ojetti, Veronica
    Candelli, Marcello
    Antonelli, Massimo
    Gasbarrini, Antonio
    Franceschi, Francesco
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2020, 156 : 84 - 91
  • [7] The Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Scale Compared to Stroke Severity Tools for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Prediction
    Crowe, Remle P.
    Myers, J. Brent
    Fernandez, Antonio R.
    Bourn, Scott
    McMullan, Jason T.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2021, 25 (01) : 67 - 75
  • [8] da Silva JA, 2017, EINSTEIN-SAO PAULO, V15, P421, DOI [10.1590/S1679-45082017AO3964, 10.1590/s1679-45082017ao3964]
  • [9] COVID-19 Preliminary Case Series: Characteristics of EMS Encounters with Linked Hospital Diagnoses
    Fernandez, Antonio R.
    Crowe, Remle P.
    Bourn, Scott
    Matt, Sarah E.
    Brown, Andrew L.
    Hawthorn, Andrew B.
    Brent Myers, J.
    [J]. PREHOSPITAL EMERGENCY CARE, 2020, 25 (01) : 16 - 27
  • [10] Is the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) superior to clinician judgement in detecting critical illness in the pre-hospital environment?
    Fullerton, James N.
    Price, Charlotte L.
    Silvey, Natalie E.
    Brace, Samantha J.
    Perkins, Gavin D.
    [J]. RESUSCITATION, 2012, 83 (05) : 557 - 562