共 50 条
Quality of care of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes
被引:10
|作者:
Scott, IA
Denaro, CP
Flores, JL
Bennett, CJ
Hickey, AC
Mudge, AM
机构:
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Med, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[3] Royal Brisbane Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[4] Queen Elizabeth II Hosp, Dept Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词:
acute coronary syndromes;
indicators;
quality of care;
D O I:
10.1046/j.1445-5994.2002.00267.x
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Measurement and improvement of quality of care is a priority issue in health care. Patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) constitute a high-risk population whose care, if shown to be suboptimal on the basis of available research evidence, may benefit from quality improvement interventions. Aim: To evaluate the quality of in-hospital care for patients with ACS, using explicit quality indicators. Methods: Retrospective case note review was undertaken of 397 patients admitted to three teaching hospitals in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, between 1 October 2000 and 17 April 2001. The main out-come measures were 12 process-of-care quality indicators, calculated as either: (i) the proportion of all patients who received specific interventions or (ii) the proportion of ideal patients who received -specific interventions (i.e. patients with clear indi-cations and lacking contraindications). Results: Quality indicators with values above 80% included: (i) patient selection for thrombolysis (100%) and discharge prescription of beta-blockers (84%), (ii) antiplatelet agents (94%) and (iii) lipid-lowering agents (82%). Indicators with values between 50% and 80% included: (i) timely per-formance of electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission (61%), (ii) early coronary angiography (75%), (iii) measurement of serum lipids (71%) and (iv) discharge prescription of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (73%). Indicators with values <50% included: (i) timely administration of thrombolysis (35%), (ii) non-invasive risk assessment (23%) and (ii) formal in-hospital and post-hospital cardiac rehabilitation (47% and 7%, respectively). Conclusion: There were delays in performing ECG and administering thrombolysis to patients who presented to emergency departments with ACS. Improvement is warranted in use of non-invasive procedures for identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from coronary revascularization as well as use of serum lipid measurements, ACE inhibitors and cardiac rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 511
页数:10
相关论文