Quality of care of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes

被引:10
作者
Scott, IA
Denaro, CP
Flores, JL
Bennett, CJ
Hickey, AC
Mudge, AM
机构
[1] Princess Alexandra Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Brisbane, Qld 4102, Australia
[2] Univ Queensland, Dept Med, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
[3] Royal Brisbane Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Brisbane, Qld 4029, Australia
[4] Queen Elizabeth II Hosp, Dept Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
acute coronary syndromes; indicators; quality of care;
D O I
10.1046/j.1445-5994.2002.00267.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Measurement and improvement of quality of care is a priority issue in health care. Patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) constitute a high-risk population whose care, if shown to be suboptimal on the basis of available research evidence, may benefit from quality improvement interventions. Aim: To evaluate the quality of in-hospital care for patients with ACS, using explicit quality indicators. Methods: Retrospective case note review was undertaken of 397 patients admitted to three teaching hospitals in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, between 1 October 2000 and 17 April 2001. The main out-come measures were 12 process-of-care quality indicators, calculated as either: (i) the proportion of all patients who received specific interventions or (ii) the proportion of ideal patients who received -specific interventions (i.e. patients with clear indi-cations and lacking contraindications). Results: Quality indicators with values above 80% included: (i) patient selection for thrombolysis (100%) and discharge prescription of beta-blockers (84%), (ii) antiplatelet agents (94%) and (iii) lipid-lowering agents (82%). Indicators with values between 50% and 80% included: (i) timely per-formance of electrocardiogram (ECG) on admission (61%), (ii) early coronary angiography (75%), (iii) measurement of serum lipids (71%) and (iv) discharge prescription of angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (73%). Indicators with values <50% included: (i) timely administration of thrombolysis (35%), (ii) non-invasive risk assessment (23%) and (ii) formal in-hospital and post-hospital cardiac rehabilitation (47% and 7%, respectively). Conclusion: There were delays in performing ECG and administering thrombolysis to patients who presented to emergency departments with ACS. Improvement is warranted in use of non-invasive procedures for identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from coronary revascularization as well as use of serum lipid measurements, ACE inhibitors and cardiac rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 511
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ARONEY C, 2000, MED J AUST S, V173, pS65
[2]  
*AUSTR COUNC HLTH, 1998, MEAS CAR AUSTR HOSP
[3]   Use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors at discharge in patients with acute myocardial infarction in the united states: Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 [J].
Barron, HV ;
Michaels, AD ;
Maynard, C ;
Every, NR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (02) :360-367
[4]   ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [J].
Braunwald, E ;
Antman, EM ;
Beasley, JW ;
Califf, RM ;
Cheitlin, MD ;
Hochman, JS ;
Jones, RH ;
Kereiakes, D ;
Kupersmith, J ;
Levin, TN ;
Pepine, CJ ;
Schaeffer, JW ;
Smith, EE ;
Steward, DE ;
Theroux, P ;
Gibbons, RJ ;
Alpert, JS ;
Eagle, KA ;
Faxon, DP ;
Fuster, V ;
Gardner, TJ ;
Gregoratos, G ;
Russell, RO ;
Smith, SC .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2000, 36 (03) :970-1056
[5]  
British Cardiac Soc Guidelines Med, 2001, HEART, V85, P133
[6]  
Bunker S, 1999, J Cardiopulm Rehabil, V19, P334, DOI 10.1097/00008483-199911000-00001
[7]  
*COMM DEP HLTH AG, 1998, 9 PHE HEALTH AIHW CO
[8]  
Fonarow GC, 2001, CIRCULATION, V103, P38
[9]   Hawthorne effects and research into professional practice [J].
Holden, JD .
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2001, 7 (01) :65-70
[10]  
King KM, 1999, CAN J CARDIOL, V15, P979