Risk of Bone Fracture in Resurfacing Hip Arthroplasty at Varus and Valgus Implant Placements

被引:9
作者
Izmin, Nor Aiman Nor [1 ]
Hazwani, Fatin [2 ]
Todo, Mitsugu [3 ]
Abdullah, Abdul Halim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Teknol MARA UiTM, Fac Mech Engn, Shah Alam 40450, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Kyushu Univ, Interdisciplinary Grad Sch Engn Sci, 6-1 Kasuga Koen, Kasuga, Fukuoka 8168580, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ, Res Inst Appl Mech, 6-1 Kasuga Koen, Kasuga, Fukuoka 8168580, Japan
关键词
Bone fracture; Damage formation criterion; Resurfacing hip arthroplasty; Sideways fall; Varus and valgus placement; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; PREDICTION; LOAD; TENSILE;
D O I
10.14716/ijtech.v11i5.4312
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
It is possible to have a varus or valgus placement of resurfacing hip implants after resurfacing hip arthroplasty based on clinical reports. The likelihood of accidents such as sideways falls during the recovery process after arthroplasty is higher for the patient due to gait adaptation and weaker lower body condition. Hence, a computational study has been conducted to predict the risk of bone fracture with different implant placements during sideways fall accidents. A CT image of a young adult with hip osteoarthritis was imported into biomechanical software to develop the 3D inhomogeneous femoral bone model. A model of the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing implant with the properties of cobalt-chromium alloy was inserted into the femur during the reconstruction of the arthroplasty, which mimics the procedure of clinical practice. The loading and boundary conditions were implemented to simulate the sideways fall accident, and the prediction of bone fracture was based on the formation of failure elements. The loading magnitude was applied based on the patient's body weight, ranging from the patient's body weight (1 BW) to five times the patient's body weight (5 BW). The fracture location was predicted to occur at the neck and trochanteric area of the femur, with the greatest damage occurring to the bone model implanted with varus placement. Our finding concludes that the varus placement of the resurfacing hip implant should be avoided whenever possible in clinical practice to sustain bone survivability.
引用
收藏
页码:1025 / 1035
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Abdullah Abdul Halim, 2014, International Journal of Applied Physics and Mathematics, V4, P286, DOI 10.7763/IJAPM.2014.V4.300
[2]   Prediction of damage formation in hip arthroplasties by finite element analysis using computed tomography images [J].
Abdullah, Abdul Halim ;
Todo, Mitsugu ;
Nakashima, Yasuharu .
MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2017, 44 :8-15
[3]   Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Review of the Evidence for Surgical Technique, Outcome, and Complications [J].
Amanatullah, Derek F. ;
Cheung, Yeukkei ;
Di Cesare, Paul E. .
ORTHOPEDIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 41 (02) :263-+
[4]   Lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following total hip arthroplasty [J].
Beaulieu, Melanie L. ;
Lamontagne, Mario ;
Beaule, Paul E. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2010, 32 (02) :269-273
[5]   Prediction of proximal femur strength using a CT-based nonlinear finite element method: Differences in predicted fracture load and site with changing load and boundary conditions [J].
Bessho, Masahiko ;
Ohnishi, Isao ;
Matsumoto, Takuya ;
Ohashi, Satoru ;
Matsuyama, Juntaro ;
Tobita, Kenji ;
Kaneko, Masako ;
Nakamura, Kozo .
BONE, 2009, 45 (02) :226-231
[6]  
Brunner LC, 2003, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V67, P537
[7]  
Elfani M, 2013, INT J TECHNOL, V4, P34
[8]   Birmingham mid-head resection periprosthetic fractures: Case report [J].
Fraile Gamarra, Ines ;
Viseu Pinheiro, Juan Fernando Jimenez ;
Cano Gala, Carlos ;
Blanco Blanco, Juan Francisco .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2019, 64 :174-176
[9]  
FREEMAN MAR, 1978, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P19
[10]  
FREEMAN MAR, 1978, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P45