On-Farm Assessment of Maize Storage and Conservation Technologies in the Central and Northern Republic of Benin

被引:5
作者
Sissinto Gbenou, Evelyne [1 ]
Patrice Adegbola, Ygue [2 ]
Manhoussi Hessavi, Pelagie [3 ]
Zossou, Segla Roch Cedrique [3 ]
Biaou, Gauthier [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Abomey Calavi, Dept Econ Socioanthropol & Commun Rural Dev, 01 BP 526, Abomey Calavi, Benin
[2] Natl Inst Agr Res Benin, Agr Policy Anal Program, 01 BP 884, Cotonou, Benin
[3] Int Ctr Res & Training Social Sci, 02 BP 238, Porto Novo, Benin
[4] Natl Univ Agr, 01 BP 55, Porto Novo, Benin
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 01期
关键词
maize; storage systems; financial profitability;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11010032
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The loss rates and financial profitability of maize storage and conservation technologies were assessed in the central and northern regions of the Republic of Benin. The experimentations were conducted specifically in the villages of Boukoumbe and Savalou and were randomly sampled. A total of four storage technologies were offered to 137 producers: the polypropylene bag, the Purdue Improved Cowpea Storage (PICS) bag, the metal silo, and the improved and closed earthen attic (with or without stock processing). The method by Pantenius was used to determine the loss rates, and the economic method of Gittinger was used to evaluate the profitability of technologies. The results showed that the technologies that recorded fewer losses in the two communes during storage were the PICS bag with grain treatment by chemical conservation measures in Savalou (9.42 +/- 4.64%) and Boukoumbe (2.69 +/- 0.77%), the PICS bag without grain treatment in Savalou (11.71 +/- 2.78%), the metal silo with grain treatment in Boukoumbe (4.92 +/- 1.36%) and the polypropylene bag with grain treatment in Savalou (10.56 +/- 2.80%) and Boukoumbe (4.02 +/- 1.23%). Therefore, the financial analysis results indicated that the most profitable storage technologies were the PICS bag with treatment in the center of Benin and the polypropylene bag without treatment in northern Benin.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   On-farm comparison of different postharvest storage technologies in a maize farming system of Tanzania Central Corridor [J].
Abass, Adebayo B. ;
Fischler, Martin ;
Schneider, Kurt ;
Daudi, Shamim ;
Gaspar, Audifas ;
Rust, Janine ;
Kabula, Esther ;
Ndunguru, Gabriel ;
Madulu, Daniel ;
Msola, David .
JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2018, 77 :55-65
[2]  
Adegbola Y.P., 2011, THESIS WAGENINGEN U, P182
[3]  
Adegbola Y.P., 2011, B RECHERCHE AGRONOMI, V8, P43
[4]  
Adeoti I., 2018, ANN U PARAKOU BE SNA, V8, P137
[5]  
Arouna A., 2011, B RECHERCHE AGRONOMI, P13
[6]   PICS bags for post-harvest storage of maize grain in West Africa [J].
Baoua, I. B. ;
Amadou, L. ;
Ousmane, B. ;
Baributsa, D. ;
Murdock, L. L. .
JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2014, 58 :20-28
[7]  
Capo-Chichi Y. J., 2006, MONOGRAPHIE COMMUNE
[8]   Effectiveness of hermetic systems in controlling maize storage pests in Kenya [J].
De Groote, Hugo ;
Kimenju, Simon C. ;
Likhayo, Paddy ;
Kanampiu, Fred ;
Tefera, Tadele ;
Hellin, Jon .
JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2013, 53 :27-36
[9]  
Fandohan P., 2000, INTRO GRENIER FERME, P29
[10]  
Gittinger P., 1985, EDI SERIES EC DEV, V2nd ed.