Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty component center of rotation affects muscle function

被引:38
作者
Hoenecke, Heinz R., Jr. [1 ]
Flores-Hernandez, Cesar [2 ]
D'Lima, Darryl D. [2 ]
机构
[1] Scripps Clin, Div Orthopaed Surg, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
[2] Scripps Clin, Shiley Ctr Orthopaed Res & Educ, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
关键词
Shoulder arthroplasty; reverse shoulder arthroplasty; glenosphere; deltoid function; glenohumeral forces; shoulder biomechanics; CUFF DEFICIENCY; PROSTHESIS; IMPINGEMENT; ARTHRITIS; ABDUCTION; DESIGN; MOTION; RANGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2013.11.025
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Medialization of the glenohumeral center of rotation alters the moment arm of the deltoid, can affect muscle function, and increases the risk for scapular notching due to impingement. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of position of the glenosphere on deltoid efficiency and the range of glenohumeral adduction. Methods: Scapulohumeral bone models were reconstructed from computed tomography scans and virtually implanted with primary or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty implants. The placement of the glenosphere was varied to simulate differing degrees of "medialization'' and inferior placement relative to the glenoid. Muscle and joint forces were computed during shoulder abduction in OpenSim musculoskeletal modeling software. Results: The average glenohumeral joint reaction forces for the primary total shoulder arthroplasty were within 5% of those previously reported in vivo. Superior placement or full lateralization of the glenosphere increased glenohumeral joint reaction forces by 10% and 18%, respectively, relative to the recommended reverse total shoulder arthroplasty position. The moment arm of the deltoid muscle was the highest at the recommended baseline surgical position. The baseline glenosphere position resulted in a glenohumeral adduction deficit averaging more than 10 degrees that increased to more than 25 degrees when the glenosphere was placed superiorly. Only with full lateralization was glenohumeral adduction unaffected by superoinferior placement. Discussion/Conclusion: Selecting optimum placement of the glenosphere involves tradeoffs in bending moment at the implant-bone interface, risk for impingement, and deltoid efficiency. A viable option is partially medializing the glenosphere, which retains most of the benefits of deltoid efficiency and reduces the risk for scapular notching. (C) 2014 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
引用
收藏
页码:1128 / 1135
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Speed of recovery after shoulder arthroplasty: a comparison of reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty
    Levy, Jonathan C.
    Everding, Nathan G.
    Gil, Carlos C., Jr.
    Stephens, Scott
    Giveans, M. Russell
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (12) : 1872 - 1881
  • [32] Patient Posture Affects Simulated ROM in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Modeling Study Using Preoperative Planning Software
    Moroder, Philipp
    Urvoy, Manuel
    Raiss, Patric
    Werthel, Jean-David
    Akgun, Doruk
    Chaoui, Jean
    Siegert, Paul
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 480 (03) : 619 - 631
  • [33] Humeral version in reverse shoulder arthroplasty affects impingement in activities of daily living
    Kontaxis, Andreas
    Chen, Xiang
    Berhouet, Julien
    Choi, Daniel
    Wright, Timothy
    Dines, David M.
    Warren, Russell F.
    Gulotta, Lawrence V.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2017, 26 (06) : 1073 - 1082
  • [34] Humeral and Glenoid Version in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review
    Berton, Alessandra
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Gulotta, Lawrence V.
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Piergentili, Ilaria
    Calabrese, Giovanni
    Roberti, Federica
    Warren, Russell F.
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (24)
  • [35] Factors affecting internal rotation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Kim, Su Cheol
    Lee, Je Eun
    Lee, Sang Min
    Yoo, Jae Chul
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2022, 27 (01) : 131 - 138
  • [36] Bilateral Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Versus Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Latif, Vaqar
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Young, Allan A.
    Liotard, Jean-Pierre
    Walch, Gilles
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (04) : E479 - E485
  • [37] In vivo reverse total shoulder arthroplasty contact mechanics
    Van de Kleut, Madeleine L.
    Nair, Chaithanya
    Milner, Jaques S.
    Holdsworth, David W.
    Athwal, George S.
    Teeter, Matthew G.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2021, 30 (02) : 421 - 429
  • [38] Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed shoulder arthroplasty
    Patel, Deepan N.
    Young, Brett
    Onyekwelu, Ikemefuna
    Zuckerman, Joseph D.
    Kwon, Young W.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (11) : 1478 - 1483
  • [39] The effects of progressive lateralization of the joint center of rotation of reverse total shoulder implants
    Costantini, Oren
    Choi, Daniel S.
    Kontaxis, Andreas
    Gulotta, Lawrence V.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (07) : 1120 - 1128
  • [40] Hemiarthroplasty and Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Conversion to Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Harrison, Alicia K.
    Knudsen, Michael L.
    Braman, Jonathan P.
    CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (04) : 501 - 508