The Place of phronesis in Philosophical Hermeneutics. A Brief Overview and a Critical Question

被引:0
作者
Bobb, Catalin Vasile [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Cluj Napoca, North Univ Ctr Baia Mare, Dept Sociohuman Sci, Fac Letters,Theol,Arts, Cluj Napoca, Romania
来源
HERMENEIA | 2020年 / 25期
关键词
hermeneutics; practical philosophy; application; phronesis; Gadamer; Ricoeur;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
It seems that phronesis has everything to do with hermeneutics. A kind of knowledge, be that hermeneutical or practical, is at work each time we interpret or act. In a way, interpreting or knowing what to do in a certain situation are similar acts. But, in the end, the main thesis of contemporary hermeneutics, at least in Gadamer's hermeneutics, is that phronesis is central to the very act of understanding as such. Although departing from such a strong thesis, Ricoeur as well holds that phronesis is central to hermeneutics. Thus, in the present article I attempt to provide a short overview of the place of phronesis in hermeneutics adding a critical question: are we entitled to hold that hermeneutics is practical philosophy?
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 36
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HERMENEUTICS RELIG E
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, GADAMERS REPERCUSSIO
[3]  
Aristotle, 1962, Nicomachean ethics
[4]  
Bauman Z., 1993, POSTMODERN ETHICS
[5]  
Bernstein Richard., 1983, OBJECTIVISM RELATIVI
[6]  
Davey Nicholas, 2006, UNIQUE UNDERSTANDING
[7]  
Figal Gunter., 2002, The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer
[8]  
Gadamer Hans-Georg., 2000, TRUTH METHOD, V2nd
[9]  
Kant Immanuel., 1994, FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPL
[10]  
Kemp T.P., 1989, The Narrative Path: The Later Works of Paul Ricoeur