Predictive factors and a corresponding treatment algorithm for controlled ovarian stimulation in patients treated with recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa) during assisted reproduction technology (ART) procedures. An analysis of 1378 patients

被引:55
作者
Howles, C. M.
Saunders, H.
Alam, V.
Engrand, P.
机构
[1] Serono Singapore Pte, Singapore 038989, Singapore
[2] Serono Int SA, Dept Clin Dev, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
age; antral follicles; BMI; controlled ovarian stimulation; follitropin alfa; FSH;
D O I
10.1185/030079906X104678
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Identifying parameters that can accurately predict the response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) would be of great benefit in assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures. An analysis was undertaken with the objective of determining whether specific factors could optimally predict a response to stimulation in ART, and to then develop a corresponding treatment algorithm that could be used to calculate the optimal starting dose of recombinant human follicle stimulating hormone (r-hFSH; follitropin alfa) for selected patients. Methods: The overall population consisted of 2280 normo-ovulatory ART patients from 11 randomised clinical trials. However, for the final analysis population, only patients less than 35 years of age who received r-hFSH monotherapy (N = 1378) were included. Results: Backwards stepwise regression modelling indicated that predictive factors for ovarian response included basal FSH, BMI, age and number of follicles < 11mm at baseline screening. The concordance probability index was 59.5% for this model. Conclusions: In the largest data series so far analysed to determine predictive factors of ovarian response, basal FSH, BMI, age and number of follicles < 11mm at screening were the most important variables in ART patients less than 35 years of age who were treated with r-hFSH monotherapy. Using these four predictive factors, a follitropin alfa starting dose calculator was developed that can be used to select the FSH starting dose required for an optimal response. The relevance of this dose calculator will be evaluated in a prospective clinical trial.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 918
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   An elevated basal FSH reflects a quantitative rather than qualitative decline of the ovarian reserve [J].
Abdalla, H ;
Thum, MY .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (04) :893-898
[2]   Outcome from consecutive assisted reproduction cycles in patients treated with recombinant follitropin alfa filled-by-bioassay and those treated with recombinant follitropin alfa filled-by-mass [J].
Balasch, J ;
Fábregues, F ;
Peñarrubia, J ;
Creus, M ;
Manau, D ;
Vidal, E ;
Casamitjana, R ;
Vanrell, JA .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2004, 8 (04) :408-413
[3]   Performance of basal follicle-stimulating hormone in the prediction of poor ovarian response and failure to become pregnant after in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis [J].
Bancsi, LFJMM ;
Broekmans, FJM ;
Mol, BWJ ;
Habbema, JDF ;
Velde, ERT .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (05) :1091-1100
[4]   Predictors of poor ovarian response in in vitro fertilization: a prospective study comparing basal markers of ovarian reserve [J].
Bancsi, LFJMM ;
Broekmans, FJM ;
Eijkemans, MJC ;
de Jong, FH ;
Habbema, JDF ;
te Velde, ER .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2002, 77 (02) :328-336
[5]   Continued improvements in the quality and consistency of follitropin alfa, recombinant human FSH [J].
Bassett, R .
REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2005, 10 (02) :169-177
[6]  
Bassil S, 1997, HUM REPROD, V12, P1240
[7]  
Camier B, 1998, HUM REPROD, V13, P159
[8]  
Chillik C, 2001, FERTIL STERIL, V76, P950
[9]   Age is a better predictor of pregnancy potential than basal follicle-stimulating hormone levels in women undergoing in vitro fertilization [J].
Chuang, CC ;
Chen, CD ;
Chao, KH ;
Chen, SU ;
Ho, HN ;
Yang, YS .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (01) :63-68
[10]   Quantification of follicle stimulating hormone (follitropin alfa):: is in vivo bioassay still relevant in the recombinant age? [J].
Driebergen, R ;
Baer, G .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2003, 19 (01) :41-46