Views on deceased organ donation in the Netherlands: A q-methodology study

被引:14
作者
Truijens, Daphne [1 ,2 ]
van Exel, Job [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Philosophy & Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Econ, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
NEXT-OF-KIN; PRESUMED CONSENT; ATTITUDES; BEHAVIOR; HEALTH; DONOR; REGISTRATION; KNOWLEDGE; RISK; COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0216479
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In many countries, such as the US, Germany, France, and the Netherlands, governments are dealing with a great shortage of organ donors. Even though people generally show positive attitudes towards organ donation, they often do not actually register as organ donors themselves. This study's objective was to explore prevailing viewpoints among the Dutch population on deceased organ donation and the relation between aspects of the viewpoints potentially influencing the decision to register as an organ donor. Although substantive research about attitudes on organ donation has been conducted, this is the first study investigating people's viewpoints focusing on the relation between beliefs, tastes, preferences, motives, goals and other constituents underlying people's viewpoints on organ donation, such as the role of the media and public policies. This Q-methodology study revealed four viewpoints: "not donating your organs is a waste", "it does not go with my religion", "my family should decide"; and "it's a good deed, but I'm doubtful". These viewpoints convey information on potential reasons for the gap between people's favourable attitudes towards organ donation and the low number of actual registrations, and opportunities for policy makers to address certain target groups more adequately.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study [J].
Abadie, Alberto ;
Gay, Sebastien .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2006, 25 (04) :599-620
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
Akhtar-Danesh Noori, 2007, Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont), V20, P67
[4]  
[Anonymous], OPEN J MED PSYCHOL
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1980, POLITICAL SUBJECTIVI
[6]  
Baker R., 2010, Operant Subjectivity: The International Journal of Q Methodology, V34, P38
[7]  
Baker Rachel, 2006, J Health Serv Res Policy, V11, P38, DOI 10.1258/135581906775094217
[8]   High-risk donors: extending our criteria in times of organ shortage [J].
Bernhardt, Alexander M. ;
Reichenspurner, Hermann .
CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 19 (05) :494-499
[9]  
Brown S.R., 1995, Operant Subjectivity, V18, P1
[10]   Good practice or positive action? Using Q methodology to identify competing views on improving gender equality in academic medicine [J].
Bryant, Louise D. ;
Burkinshaw, Paula ;
House, Allan O. ;
West, Robert M. ;
Ward, Vicky .
BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (08)