Interpreting quantum field theory

被引:21
作者
Ruetsche, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Philosophy, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/341047
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
The availability of unitarily inequivalent representations of the canonical commutation relations constituting a quantization of a classical field theory raises questions about how to formulate and pursue quantum field theory. In a minimally technical way, I explain how these questions arise and how advocates of the Hilbert space and of the algebraic approaches to quantum theory might answer them. Where these answers differ, I sketch considerations for and against each approach, as well as considerations which might temper their apparent rivalry.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 378
页数:31
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
ARAGEORGIS A, 2002, IN PRESS STUDIES HIS
[2]  
ARAGEORGIS A, 1995, THESIS U PITTSBURGH
[3]  
Baez J., 1992, INTRO ALGEBRAIC CONS
[4]   The Hawking information loss paradox: The anatomy of a controversy [J].
Belot, G ;
Earman, J ;
Ruetsche, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1999, 50 (02) :189-229
[5]  
BRATELLI O, 1987, OPERATORS ALGEBRAS Q, V1
[6]   Are Rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory [J].
Clifton, R ;
Halvorson, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2001, 52 (03) :417-470
[7]  
CUSHING J, 1987, PHILOS FDN QUANTUM F, P25
[8]  
EMCH CG, 1972, ALGEBRAIC METHODS ST
[9]   (Dis-)solving the puzzle of the arrow of radiation [J].
Frisch, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2000, 51 (03) :381-410
[10]   SINGULARITY STRUCTURE OF 2-POINT FUNCTION IN QUANTUM FIELD-THEORY IN CURVED SPACETIME [J].
FULLING, SA ;
SWEENY, M ;
WALD, RM .
COMMUNICATIONS IN MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 1978, 63 (03) :257-264