Inference of the optimal pretarget electron beam parameters in a Monte Carlo virtual linac model through simulated annealing

被引:10
作者
Bush, Karl [1 ]
Zavgorodni, Sergei [2 ,3 ]
Beckham, Wayne [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Victoria, Dept Phys & Astron, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada
[2] British Columbia Canc Agcy, Dept Med Phys, Vancouver Isl Ctr, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada
[3] Univ Victoria, Dept Phys & Astron, Victoria, BC V8R 6V5, Canada
关键词
dosimetry; electron beams; linear accelerators; Monte Carlo methods; phantoms; radiation therapy; simulated annealing; MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATORS; RADIOTHERAPY PHOTON BEAMS; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; DISCREPANCIES; THERAPY; ENERGY; SPOT; CODE;
D O I
10.1118/1.3130102
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to develop an efficient method to determine the optimal intensity distribution of the pretarget electron beam in a Monte Carlo (MC) accelerator model able to most accurately reproduce a set of measured photon field profiles for a given accelerator geometry and nominal photon beam energy. The method has the ability to reduce the number of simulations required to commission a MC accelerator model and has achieved better agreement with measurement than other methods described in literature. The method begins from a cylindrically symmetric pretarget electron beam (radius of 0.5 cm) of uniform intensity. This beam is subdivided into annular regions of fluence for which each region is individually transported through the accelerator head and into a water phantom. A simulated annealing search is then performed to determine the optimal combination of weights of the annular fluences that provide a best match between the measured dose distributions and the weighted sum of annular dose distributions for particular pretarget electron energy. When restricted to Gaussian intensity distributions, the optimization determined an optimal FWHM=1.34 mm for 18.0 MeV electrons, with a RMSE=0.49% on 40x40 cm(2) lateral profiles. When allowed to deviate from Gaussian intensities a further reduction in RMSE was achieved. For our Clinac 21 EX accelerator MC model (based on the 1996 Varian Oncology Systems, Monte Carlo Project package), the optimal unrestricted intensity distribution was found to be a Gaussian-like solution (18.0 MeV, FWHM=1.10 mm, 40x40 cm(2) profile, and RMSE=0.15%) with the presence of an extra focal halo contribution on the order of 10% of the maximum Gaussian intensity. Using the optimally derived intensity, 10x10 and 4x4 cm(2) profiles were found to be in agreement with measurement with a maximum RMSE=0.49%. The optimized Gaussian and unrestricted values of the electron beam FWHM were both within the range of those inferred by focal spot image measurements performed by Jaffray ["X-ray sources of medical linear accelerators: Focal and extra-focal radiation," Med. Phys. 20, 1417-1427 (1993)]. The inference of an extra focal pretarget electron component may be an indicator of a deficiency in the MC model and needs further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:2309 / 2319
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: Issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning [J].
Chetty, Indrin J. ;
Curran, Bruce ;
Cygler, Joanna E. ;
DeMarco, John J. ;
Ezzell, Gary ;
Faddegon, Bruce A. ;
Kawrakow, Iwan ;
Keall, Paul J. ;
Liu, Helen ;
Ma, C. -M. Charlie ;
Rogers, D. W. O. ;
Seuntjens, Jan ;
Sheikh-Bagheri, Daryoush ;
Siebers, Jeffrey V. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (12) :4818-4853
[2]   On the discrepancies between Monte Carlo dose calculations and measurements for the 18 MV Varian photon beam [J].
Chibani, Omar ;
Ma, C. -M. Charlie .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) :1206-1216
[3]  
De Smedt B, 2005, PHYS MED BIOL, V50, P5935, DOI [10.1088/0031-9155/50/012, 10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/012]
[4]   Dose discrepancies between Monte Carlo calculations and measurements in the buildup region for a high-energy photon beam [J].
Ding, GX .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (11) :2459-2463
[5]   Electron spectra derived from depth dose distributions [J].
Faddegon, BA ;
Blevis, I .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) :514-526
[6]   Benchmarking of Monte Carlo simulation of bremsstrahlung from thick targets at radiotherapy energies [J].
Faddegon, Bruce A. ;
Asai, Makoto ;
Perl, Joseph ;
Ross, Carl ;
Sempau, Josep ;
Tinslay, Jane ;
Salvat, Francesc .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (10) :4308-4317
[7]   Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC plus plus Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases [J].
Hasenbalg, F. ;
Neuenschwander, H. ;
Mini, R. ;
Born, E. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (13) :3679-3691
[8]   Experimental determination of electron source parameters for accurate Monte Carlo calculation of large field electron therapy [J].
Huang, VW ;
Seuntjens, J ;
Devic, S ;
Verhaegen, F .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (05) :779-786
[9]   X-RAY SOURCES OF MEDICAL LINEAR ACCELERATORS - FOCAL AND EXTRA-FOCAL RADIATION [J].
JAFFRAY, DA ;
BATTISTA, JJ ;
FENSTER, A ;
MUNRO, P .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (05) :1417-1427
[10]   Accurate condensed history Monte Carlo simulation of electron transport. I. EGSnrc, the new EGS4 version [J].
Kawrakow, I .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2000, 27 (03) :485-498