Reclassification of stages leads to changes of relative survival rates: The new TNM classification for breast cancer

被引:3
作者
Sinn, HP
Habedank, ACC
von Fournier, D
Bastert, G
Schneeweiss, A
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Pathol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Frauenklin, Abt Allgemeine Frauenheilkunde & Geburtshilfe, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[3] Univ Heidelberg, Frauenklin, Abt Gynakol Radiol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
breast cancer; TNM classification; staging; survival;
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-821238
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose: The 6th edition of TNM classification, valid since January 1, 2003, shows important changes in breast cancer classification, especially regarding lymph node status and UICC stage grouping. The effects of the redefinition of the TNM categories on stage and prognosis have not yet been studied in a large cohort of patients. Patients and Methods: We analyzed TNM staging of 5366 breast cancer cases registered at the Gynecological University Hospital Heidelberg (diagnosed from 1985 to 2000) according to the old and the new TNM classification. The effects of the new classification system were examined with regard to stage grouping and survival. Results: One of the most important effects of the 6th TNM edition is that reclassification of patients with nodal stage pN1 (5th edition) are now graded in the new nodal categories pN1, pN2 or pN3 according to the number and the localization of lymph node metastasis. This shifting of cases significantly increases the number of patients in UICC Stage III. Thereby, relative survival rates in the new pN categories 1, 2 and 3 and in the new UICC Stages II and III are visibly improved (so called "Will Rogers Phenomenon" or "stage migration"). Apart from that, splitting of the big group of patients with nodal stage pN1 (5th edition) provides a prognostically more meaningful stratification of patients, permitting easier identification of prognostically unfavorable cases. A new division of cases also resulted for patients with nodal stage pN2 (5th edition) according to the number of affected lymph nodes, permitting a better identification of prognostically more favorable cases in this group. Conclusion: Prognostic data that relate to the 5th edition of TNM and the tumor stages defined therein are not directly comparable with the 6th edition of TNM. This should be considered when analyzing clinical studies using the new staging system.
引用
收藏
页码:962 / 967
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]   THE ROGERS,WILL PHENOMENON - STAGE MIGRATION AND NEW DIAGNOSTIC-TECHNIQUES AS A SOURCE OF MISLEADING STATISTICS FOR SURVIVAL IN CANCER [J].
FEINSTEIN, AR ;
SOSIN, DM ;
WELLS, CK .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1985, 312 (25) :1604-1608
[2]   DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS REQUIRING PROLONGED OBSERVATION OF EACH PATIENT .2. ANALYSIS AND EXAMPLES [J].
PETO, R ;
PIKE, MC ;
ARMITAGE, P ;
BRESLOW, NE ;
COX, DR ;
HOWARD, SV ;
MANTEL, N ;
MCPHERSON, K ;
PETO, J ;
SMITH, PG .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1977, 35 (01) :1-39
[3]   Revision of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for breast cancer [J].
Singletary, SE ;
Allred, C ;
Ashley, P ;
Bassett, LW ;
Berry, D ;
Bland, KI ;
Borgen, PI ;
Clark, CG ;
Edge, SB ;
Hayes, DF ;
Hughes, LL ;
Hutter, RVP ;
Morrow, M ;
Page, DL ;
Recht, A ;
Theriault, RL ;
Thor, A ;
Weaver, DL ;
Wieand, HS ;
Greene, FL .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (17) :3628-3636
[4]  
Sobin LH, 2001, CANCER, V91, P1589, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010415)91:8+<1589::AID-CNCR1170>3.0.CO
[5]  
2-K
[6]  
Wittekind C., 2002, UICC TNM KLASSIFIKAT
[7]  
WITTEKIND C, 1997, UICC TNM KLASSIFIKAT
[8]   Changes in the 2003 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for breast cancer dramatically affect stage-specific survival [J].
Woodward, WA ;
Strom, EA ;
Tucker, SL ;
McNeese, MD ;
Perkins, GH ;
Schechter, NR ;
Singletary, SE ;
Theriault, RL ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Hunt, KK ;
Buchholz, TA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (17) :3244-3248