Bridge Deck Replacement of Posttensioned Concrete Box-Girder Bridges

被引:2
作者
Zhang, Youyou [1 ]
Chai, Y. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
Box girder bridges;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001646
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper studies the feasibility of replacing damaged deck of posttensioned concrete box-girder bridges without the use of falsework to support the superstructure span. Parameters of the study included straight, curved, and skewed bridges, and simple versus multispan bridges. Deck replacement in posttensioned box-girder bridges requires special attention because the deck forms an integral part of the load-resisting mechanism and large precompression has been locked in by the posttensioning in the superstructure. The potential unfavorable stress reversals or redistribution during deck replacement should be carefully considered. In this study, practical options for lane closure and traffic rerouting were incorporated into the replacement strategies, and these options included temporal longitudinal and transverse replacements. Additionally, time-dependent properties for concrete and steel representatives of current construction practice were included in the finite-element model. Results indicated that full-depth deck replacement may be difficult and undesirable because the current AASHTO stress limits were violated in all four of the posttensioned box-girder bridges selected for the study. Additionally, the increase in permanent deflections through deck replacement was relatively large for these selected bridges, which is likely to result in degraded ride quality, safety, and poor drainage condition for the bridge. As a general trend, critical stresses at the top of the web and downward deflection of the girders were found to accumulate as the deteriorated deck was removed and a new deck cast. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
AASHTO, 2017, Bridge Design Specifications
[2]  
Caltrans, 2008, DEV STAK CONF K RAIL
[3]  
CEB-FIP, 1990, DESIGN CONCRETE STRU
[4]  
CSI, 2017, CSI Analysis Reference Manual for SAP2000, ETABS, SAFE and CSiBridge
[5]  
Culmo MP, 2000, TRANSPORT RES REC, P139
[6]   Impact of Overweight Trucks on the Service Life of Bridge Girders [J].
Lou, Peng ;
Nassif, Hani ;
Su, Dan ;
Truban, Paul .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2642) :103-117
[7]  
Ramey G, 2006, 930436 AL DEP TRANSP
[8]  
Ramey G., 1998, Rapid rehabilitation/replacement of bridge decks
[9]  
Reppi F, 2001, RDT01032 NEV DEP TRA
[10]  
Sadraie H., 2015, POSTTENSIONED BOX GI