Fluorescence in situ hybridization identifies cryptic t(16;16)(p13;q22) masked by del(16)(q22) in a case of AML-M4 Eo

被引:12
作者
Merchant, SH
Haines, S
Hall, B
Hozier, J
Viswanatha, DS
机构
[1] Univ New Mexico, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Pathol, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
[2] Vet Adm Med Ctr, Albuquerque, NM 87108 USA
[3] Tricove Reference Lab, Albuquerque, NM 87108 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60521-1
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
We report a patient presenting with acute myeloid. leukemia (AML)-M4 Eo, in whom conventional cytogenetic analysis revealed a 46, XY, del(16)(q22) karyotype. Molecular analysis of the bone marrow cells using reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) identified a CBFbeta-MYH11, "type A" fusion transcript. However, despite a thorough re-evaluation, a balanced chromosome 16 abnormality could not be definitively identified by cytogenetics. Since there exists a small possibility of obtaining a false-positive PCR result, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis using dual-color, break-apart probes for CBFbeta was performed to elucidate the mechanism of fusion gene formation and thus confirm the RT-PCR results. FISH analysis clearly revealed a cryptic t(16;16), which was probably masked by the del(16)(q22). FISH is the preferred diagnostic procedure to elucidate the CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion in this situation, and resolves the possibility of both false-positive and false-negative results with RT-PCR technique. Due to the improved prognosis of AML associated with the CBFbeta-MYH11 fusion compared to AML generally, we recommend the use of FISH for detection of inv(16)/t(16;16)/CBFbeta-MYH11 in patients with failed, complex, or apparently normal cytogenetics, and in whom the cell morphology indicates the strong possibility of this gene fusion.
引用
收藏
页码:271 / 274
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
BLOOMFIELD CD, 1992, LEUKEMIA, V6, P65
[2]  
Dierlamm J, 1998, GENE CHROMOSOME CANC, V22, P87, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(199806)22:2<87::AID-GCC1>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-2
[4]  
GHADDAR HM, 1994, LEUKEMIA, V8, P1269
[5]   Identification of false-positive CBFβ/MYH11 RT-PCR results [J].
Hackwell, SM ;
Robinson, DO ;
Harvey, JF ;
Ross, FM .
LEUKEMIA, 1999, 13 (10) :1617-1619
[6]  
Hernández JM, 2000, HAEMATOLOGICA, V85, P481
[7]   Reported cryptic rearrangements of CBFβ-MYH11 in acute myeloid leukaemia are not due to false priming of contaminating DNA [J].
Langabeer, SE ;
Gale, RE ;
Walker, H ;
Linch, DC .
LEUKEMIA, 2000, 14 (05) :944-945
[8]   ASSOCIATION OF AN INVERSION OF CHROMOSOME-16 WITH ABNORMAL MARROW EOSINOPHILS IN ACUTE MYELOMONOCYTIC LEUKEMIA - A UNIQUE CYTOGENETIC CLINICOPATHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION [J].
LEBEAU, MM ;
LARSON, RA ;
BITTER, MA ;
VARDIMAN, JW ;
GOLOMB, HM ;
ROWLEY, JD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1983, 309 (11) :630-636
[9]   MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF THE CHROMOSOME-16 INVERSION IN THE M4EO SUBTYPE OF ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA [J].
LIU, PP ;
HAJRA, A ;
WIJMENGA, C ;
COLLINS, FS .
BLOOD, 1995, 85 (09) :2289-2302
[10]   Variant three-way translocation of inversion 16 in AML-M4Eo confirmed by fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis [J].
Martinez-Climent, JA ;
Comes, AM ;
Vizcarra, E ;
Reshmi, S ;
Benet, I ;
Marugan, I ;
Tormo, M ;
Terol, MJ ;
Solano, C ;
Arbona, C ;
Prosper, F ;
Barragan, E ;
Bolufer, P ;
Rowley, JD ;
García-Conde, J .
CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 1999, 110 (02) :111-114