Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination

被引:181
作者
Williams, BA
Rogers, TL
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Anthropol & Study Relig, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Anthropol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
forensic science; sex determination; morphology; skull; precision; accuracy; expert witness testimony;
D O I
10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00177.x
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Sex determination is a key analysis that forensic anthropologists perform in order to construct a biological profile of human remains. The techniques used in forensic investigations must meet the Mohan or Daubert criteria, for admissibility in a court of law. In this study, the precision and accuracy of 21 morphological characteristics of the skull were tested on a modern sample of 50 adult crania of European White ancestry. The following craniofacial features are identified as high-quality traits, defined by intraobserver error <= 10% and accuracy >= 80%: mastoid size, supraorbital ridge size, general size and architecture, rugosity of the zygomatic extension, size and shape of the nasal aperture, and gonial angle. Ninety-six percent accuracy and 92% precision were achieved using 20 traits in combination. Fisher's exact probability tests revealed no significant differences (p=0.05) in the levels of precision or accuracy between age categories. Sex-related bias in accuracy was found for the following cranial features: ramus symphysis (p=0.009), zygomatic extension (p=0.0016), and occipital markings (p=0.0013). These traits demonstrated a greater tendency to be scored male than female.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 735
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bass W., 1995, HUMAN OSTEOLOGY LAB
[2]  
Burns K.R., 1999, FORENSIC ANTHR TRAIN
[3]  
Byers S.N., 2002, INTRO FORENSIC ANTHR
[4]   Identification of a potent serum factor that causes desensitization of the receptor for C-type natriuretic peptide [J].
Ted D Chrisman ;
Dorenda T Perkins ;
David L Garbers .
Cell Communication and Signaling, 1 (1)
[5]  
Giles E., 1970, Personal identification in mass disasters, P99
[6]  
Graw M, 1999, AM J PHYS ANTHROPOL, V108, P91, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199901)108:1<91::AID-AJPA5>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-X
[8]  
Krogman W. M., 1986, The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine, V2nd
[9]  
Maat GJR, 1997, INT J OSTEOARCHAEOL, V7, P575, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1212(199711/12)7:6<575::AID-OA308>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-4