EVOLUTION OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY

被引:44
作者
Orvieto, M. A. [1 ]
Patel, V. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Hosp Celebrat Heath, Global Robot Inst, Orlando, FL USA
关键词
Prostate cancer; prostatectomy; robotic surgery; robot-assisted prostatectomy; radical prostatectomy; laparoscopy; review; POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS; TERM CANCER CONTROL; LEARNING-CURVE; LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; RECONSTRUCTION; OUTCOMES; PRESERVATION; ANASTOMOSIS;
D O I
10.1177/145749690909800203
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction and Objective: Open radical prostatectomy (RRP) is the gold standard and most widespread treatment for clinically localized prostate cancer. However, in recent years robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RARP) is rapidly gaining acceptance among urologists worldwide. We sought to outline our surgical technique of robotic radical prostatectomy and provide practical recommendations based on available reports and personal experience. We also critically review the current experience on RARP worldwide and compare the available data with the gold standard open RRP series. Material and Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed for all published manuscripts between 1997 and 2008 using the keywords - 'robotic radical prostatectomy, 'robot-assisted radical prostatectomy', 'laparoscopic radical prostatectomy' and 'roboticusing the Medline database. Results: A total of 226 original manuscripts on RARP were identified. Manuscripts were selected according to their relevance to the current topic (i.e. original articles, number of patients in the series, prospective data collection) and incorporated into this review. Conclusions: Eight years after the first RARP, multiple series are mature enough to demonstrate safety, efficiency and reproducibility of the procedure, as well as oncologic and functional outcomes comparable to its open counterpart. Further prospective, randomized studies comparing both surgical techniques are necessary in order to draw more definitive conclusions.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 88
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies Reporting Oncologic Outcome After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Novara, Giacomo
    Ficarra, Vincenzo
    Mocellin, Simone
    Ahlering, Thomas E.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Graefen, Markus
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Menon, Mani
    Patel, Vipul R.
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Tewari, Ashutosh K.
    Van Poppel, Hendrik
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Mottrie, Alexandre
    Rosen, Raymond C.
    Wilson, Timothy G.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2012, 62 (03) : 382 - 404
  • [42] Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010
    Singh, Iqbal
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2010, 10 (05) : 671 - 682
  • [43] Bladder neck size and its association with urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Kohjimoto, Yasuo
    Higuchi, Masatoshi
    Yamashita, Shimpei
    Kikkawa, Kazuro
    Hara, Isao
    BJUI COMPASS, 2023, 4 (02): : 181 - 186
  • [44] Posterior Reconstruction Before Anastomosis Improves the Anastomosis Time During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Bernie, Aaron M.
    Caire, Arthur A.
    Conley, Sarah P.
    Oommen, Mathew
    Boylu, Ugur
    Thomas, Raju
    Lee, Benjamin R.
    JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2010, 14 (04) : 520 - 524
  • [45] Robot assisted radical prostatectomy: the new standard?
    Laviana, A. A.
    Williams, S. B.
    King, E. D.
    Chuang, R. J.
    Hu, J. C.
    MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2015, 67 (01) : 47 - 53
  • [46] Techniques and Outcomes of Salvage Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (sRARP)
    De Groote, R.
    Nathan, A.
    De Bleser, E.
    Pavan, N.
    Sridhar, A.
    Kelly, J.
    Sooriakumaran, P.
    Briggs, T.
    Nathan, S.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (06) : 885 - 892
  • [47] Intrapelvic Fat Makes Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Difficult
    Kadono, Yoshifumi
    Ueno, Satoru
    Makino, Tomoyuki
    Ofude, Mitsuo
    Izumi, Kouji
    Gabata, Toshifimi
    Namiki, Mikio
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (10) : 5523 - 5528
  • [48] Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Inching Toward Gold Standard
    Sood, Akshay
    Jeong, Wooju
    Peabody, James O.
    Hemal, Ashok K.
    Menon, Mani
    UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 41 (04) : 473 - +
  • [49] Predictors of Early Continence after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Yamada, Yuta
    Fujimura, Tetsuya
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Sugihara, Toru
    Nakagawa, Tohru
    Kume, Haruki
    Igawa, Yasuhiko
    Homma, Yukio
    LUTS-LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS, 2018, 10 (03) : 287 - 291
  • [50] The natural history of voiding function after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Wang, Lushun
    Chung, Stephanie Fook-Chong Man
    Yip, Sidney Kam Hung
    Lau, Weber Kam On
    Cheng, Christopher Wai Sam
    Sim, Hong Gee
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 29 (02) : 177 - 182