Do conservation auctions crowd out voluntary environmentally friendly activities?

被引:24
作者
Kits, Gerda J. [1 ]
Adamowicz, Wiktor L. [1 ]
Boxall, Peter C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Resource Econ & Environm Sociol, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
关键词
Conservation auction; Crowding out; Environmental policy; Experimental economics; Social behavior; PUBLIC-GOODS; SOCIAL PREFERENCES; POLICY; FOUNDATIONS; RECIPROCITY; INCENTIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.05.014
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Research has shown that introducing external incentives to encourage pro-social behavior, such as monetary rewards or regulation, may crowd out voluntary pro-social activity. This has implications for the appropriate design and use of such incentive-based programs. This study investigates motivational crowding out in the case of conservation auctions, a relatively new tool that provides monetary incentives to encourage landowners to adopt environmentally friendly management practices. Our experimental evidence shows that the introduction and subsequent removal of a conservation auction significantly reduces voluntary provision of environmental quality (via monetary donations to an environmental charity), compared to a control group that does not experience an auction. We also attempt to examine some economic theories of behavior that explain this effect according to either individual motivations or social interactions, and our initial exploration finds that crowding out occurs regardless of whether or not participants have opportunities to interact with one another during the experiment. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / 123
页数:6
相关论文
共 43 条
[21]   Auctioning conservation contracts: A theoretical analysis and an application [J].
LataczLohmann, U ;
VanderHamsvoort, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1997, 79 (02) :407-418
[22]  
Levine DK, 1998, REV ECON DYNAM, V1, P593
[23]   What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences reveal about the real world? [J].
Levitt, Steven D. ;
List, John A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES, 2007, 21 (02) :153-174
[24]   Do Green Products Make Us Better People? [J].
Mazar, Nina ;
Zhong, Chen-Bo .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (04) :494-498
[25]  
Nostbakken L., 2009, CAN RES ENV EC STUDY
[26]   Homo Economicus and Homo Politicus: interpretation and aggregation of environmental values [J].
Nyborg, K .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2000, 42 (03) :305-322
[27]   Does public policy crowd out private contributions to public goods? [J].
Nyborg, K ;
Rege, M .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2003, 115 (03) :397-418
[28]   Green consumers and public policy: On socially contingent moral motivation [J].
Nyborg, Karine ;
Howarth, Richard B. ;
Brekke, Kjell Arne .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2006, 28 (04) :351-366
[29]   Public benefits, private benefits, and policy mechanism choice for land-use change for environmental benefits [J].
Pannell, David J. .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2008, 84 (02) :225-240
[30]  
RABIN M, 1993, AM ECON REV, V83, P1281