Comment on: Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses

被引:15
作者
Papageorgiou, Spyridon N.
Koletsi, Despina
Iliadi, Anna
Peltomaki, Timo
Eliades, Theodore
机构
[1] Clinic of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich
[2] Department of Biomaterials, School of Dentistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens
[3] Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere
[4] Department of Ear and Oral Diseases, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere
[5] Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio
关键词
D O I
10.1093/ejo/cjz101
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The use of orthodontic aligners to treat a variety of malocclusions has seen considerable increase in the last years, yet evidence about their efficacy and adverse effects relative to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances remains unclear. Objective: This systematic review assesses the efficacy of aligners and fixed appliances for comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Search methods: Eight databases were searched without limitations in April 2019. Selection criteria: Randomized or matched non-randomized studies. Data collection and analysis: Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was done independently in triplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted, followed by sensitivity analyses, and the GRADE analysis of the evidence quality. Results: A total of 11 studies (4 randomized/7 non-randomized) were included comparing aligners with braces (887 patients; mean age 28.0 years; 33% male). Moderate quality evidence indicated that treatment with orthodontic aligners is associated with worse occlusal outcome with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (3 studies; MD = 9.9; 95% CI = 3.6-16.2) and more patients with unacceptable results (3 studies; RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0). No significant differences were seen for treatment duration. The main limitations of existing evidence pertained to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of included studies. Conclusions: Orthodontic treatment with aligners is associated with worse treatment outcome compared to fixed appliances in adult patients. Current evidence does not support the clinical use of aligners as a treatment modality that is equally effective to the gold standard of braces. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42019131589). © 2019 The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Orthodontic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
引用
收藏
页码:344 / 346
页数:3
相关论文
共 2 条
[1]  
Li WH, 2015, INT J CLIN EXP MED, V8, P8276
[2]  
Papageorgiou SN, 2020, EUR J ORTHODONT, V42, P331, DOI 10.1093/ejo/cjz094