Enemy Mine: Negative Partisanship and Satisfaction with Democracy

被引:33
作者
Ridge, Hannah M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, 140 Sci Dr,208 Gross Hall Campus,Box 90204, Durham, NC 27708 USA
关键词
Democracy; Satisfaction with democracy; Polarization; Political parties; Partisanship; PARTY IDENTIFICATION; WINNERS; POLARIZATION; INSTITUTIONS; ELECTIONS; QUALITY; SIDE;
D O I
10.1007/s11109-020-09658-7
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Polarization has increased in recent decades, including emotional distance between partisans. While positive partisan identity has been linked to the absorption of democratic norms and democratic satisfaction, this article addresses the impact of negative partisanship on citizens' satisfaction with the functioning of their democracies. Employing two measures of negative partisanship - dislike for a party and unwillingness to ever vote for a party - the article finds that negative partisanship is linked to lower satisfaction with democracy, particularly negative partisanship for major parties. It also finds that respondents' sentiments towards other parties moderate the experience of electoral outcomes; the win/loss satisfaction gap is greater for negative partisans. Defeat is more strongly tied to satisfaction for negative partisans of governing parties. Coalition membership, on the other hand, is more valuable to them. This relationship raises concerns that increasing rates of negative partisan identity reduces democratic commitment, undermining democratic stability.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1295
页数:25
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   AFFECT, NOT IDEOLOGY A SOCIAL IDENTITY PERSPECTIVE ON POLARIZATION [J].
Iyengar, Shanto ;
Sood, Gaurav ;
Lelkes, Yphtach .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2012, 76 (03) :405-431
[22]   Cross-National Analyses of Satisfaction with Democracy and Ideological Congruence [J].
Kim, Myunghee .
JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES, 2009, 19 (01) :49-72
[23]  
Levitsky S., 2018, How democracies die
[24]   Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics [J].
Linde, J ;
Ekman, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2003, 42 (03) :391-408
[25]   Social Protection and Satisfaction with Democracy: a Multi-level Analysis [J].
Luhiste, Kadri .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 2014, 62 (04) :784-803
[26]   A CROSS-CUTTING CALM HOW SOCIAL SORTING DRIVES AFFECTIVE POLARIZATION [J].
Mason, Lilliana .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2016, 80 :351-377
[27]  
Mayer SJ, 2017, RES POLITICS, V4, DOI 10.1177/2053168016686636
[28]   Ideological Congruence and Citizen Satisfaction: Evidence From 25 Advanced Democracies [J].
Mayne, Quinton ;
Hakhverdian, Armen .
COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2017, 50 (06) :822-849
[29]   Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities [J].
Mccoy, Jennifer ;
Rahman, Tahmina ;
Somer, Murat .
AMERICAN BEHAVIORAL SCIENTIST, 2018, 62 (01) :16-42
[30]   Negative Partisanship in a Multi-party System: The Case of Canada [J].
McGregor, R. Michael ;
Caruana, Nicholas J. ;
Stephenson, Laura B. .
JOURNAL OF ELECTIONS PUBLIC OPINION AND PARTIES, 2015, 25 (03) :300-316