Intersectoral burden sharing of CO2 mitigation in China in 2020

被引:18
作者
Chen, Weidong [1 ]
He, Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Burden sharing; China; Choice preference; CO2; mitigation; intensity; Multi criteria; Sectoral allocation; REGIONAL ALLOCATION; EMISSION REDUCTIONS; ENERGY; DIFFERENTIATION; STRATEGIES; ABATEMENT; TARGET; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11027-014-9566-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to provide a sector-based method for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions control and to disaggregate China's national CO2 mitigation burden at the sectoral level. Based on a detailed analysis of three burden sharing indicators-responsibility, capacity, and efficiency-this paper derives a mitigation burden index to suggest which economic sectors should bear more (or less) mitigation burden. A multi criteria allocation model of sectoral CO2 intensity (CO2 per unit of added value) is then constructed to determine each sector's mitigation target for 2020. The main findings are: (1) Allocation results based on multi criteria are more acceptable and practical than those based on only one criterion. (2) Policy maker preference for criteria has a significant effect on allocation results. (3) The fours sectors, manufacture of raw chemical materials and chemical products, manufacture of non-metallic mineral products, smelting and pressing of ferrous metals, and other services, consistently bear the highest mitigation burden. This paper offers policy makers a sector-based method to control CO2 emissions. Combining this method with sectoral potential for technological advancement and sectoral mitigation costs would produce a more feasible and cost effective burden sharing scheme.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Global emission reductions through a sectoral intensity target scheme
    Akimoto, Keigo
    Sano, Fuminori
    Oda, Junichiro
    Homma, Takashi
    Rout, Ullash Kumar
    Tomoda, Toshimasa
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, 8 : S46 - S59
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, GREENH GAS INV IPCC
  • [3] [Anonymous], INF WORKSH QUANT LIM
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2009, CHINA ENERGY STAT YB
  • [5] Baer P., 2007, The right to development in a climate constrained world: The Greenhouse Development Rights framework
  • [6] Comparison of CO2 emission scenarios and mitigation opportunities in China's five sectors in 2020
    Cai, Wenjia
    Wang, Can
    Chen, Jining
    Wang, Ke
    Zhang, Ying
    Lu, Xuedu
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (03) : 1181 - 1194
  • [7] Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Industrial CO2 Emissions in China
    Chen, Liang
    Yang, Zhifeng
    Chen, Bin
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (05) : 2319 - 2337
  • [8] Assessment of China's climate commitment and non-fossil energy plan towards 2020 using hybrid AIM/CGE model
    Dai, Hancheng
    Masui, Toshihiko
    Matsuoka, Yuzuru
    Fujimori, Shinichiro
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) : 2875 - 2887
  • [9] Sharing developed countries' post-2012 greenhouse gas emission reductions based on comparable efforts
    den Elzen, Michel G. J.
    Hohne, Niklas
    Hagemann, Markus M.
    van Vliet, Jasper
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    [J]. MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2010, 15 (05) : 433 - 465
  • [10] An effective allocation criterion for CO2 emissions
    Gupta, S
    Bhandari, PM
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (12) : 727 - 736