Intersectoral burden sharing of CO2 mitigation in China in 2020

被引:18
作者
Chen, Weidong [1 ]
He, Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Burden sharing; China; Choice preference; CO2; mitigation; intensity; Multi criteria; Sectoral allocation; REGIONAL ALLOCATION; EMISSION REDUCTIONS; ENERGY; DIFFERENTIATION; STRATEGIES; ABATEMENT; TARGET; POLICY;
D O I
10.1007/s11027-014-9566-3
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The aim of this paper is to provide a sector-based method for carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions control and to disaggregate China's national CO2 mitigation burden at the sectoral level. Based on a detailed analysis of three burden sharing indicators-responsibility, capacity, and efficiency-this paper derives a mitigation burden index to suggest which economic sectors should bear more (or less) mitigation burden. A multi criteria allocation model of sectoral CO2 intensity (CO2 per unit of added value) is then constructed to determine each sector's mitigation target for 2020. The main findings are: (1) Allocation results based on multi criteria are more acceptable and practical than those based on only one criterion. (2) Policy maker preference for criteria has a significant effect on allocation results. (3) The fours sectors, manufacture of raw chemical materials and chemical products, manufacture of non-metallic mineral products, smelting and pressing of ferrous metals, and other services, consistently bear the highest mitigation burden. This paper offers policy makers a sector-based method to control CO2 emissions. Combining this method with sectoral potential for technological advancement and sectoral mitigation costs would produce a more feasible and cost effective burden sharing scheme.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Global emission reductions through a sectoral intensity target scheme [J].
Akimoto, Keigo ;
Sano, Fuminori ;
Oda, Junichiro ;
Homma, Takashi ;
Rout, Ullash Kumar ;
Tomoda, Toshimasa .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2008, 8 :S46-S59
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, GREENH GAS INV IPCC
[3]  
[Anonymous], INF WORKSH QUANT LIM
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, CHINA ENERGY STAT YB
[5]  
Baer P., 2007, The right to development in a climate constrained world: The Greenhouse Development Rights framework
[6]   Comparison of CO2 emission scenarios and mitigation opportunities in China's five sectors in 2020 [J].
Cai, Wenjia ;
Wang, Can ;
Chen, Jining ;
Wang, Ke ;
Zhang, Ying ;
Lu, Xuedu .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (03) :1181-1194
[7]   Decomposition Analysis of Energy-Related Industrial CO2 Emissions in China [J].
Chen, Liang ;
Yang, Zhifeng ;
Chen, Bin .
ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (05) :2319-2337
[8]   Assessment of China's climate commitment and non-fossil energy plan towards 2020 using hybrid AIM/CGE model [J].
Dai, Hancheng ;
Masui, Toshihiko ;
Matsuoka, Yuzuru ;
Fujimori, Shinichiro .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (05) :2875-2887
[9]   Sharing developed countries' post-2012 greenhouse gas emission reductions based on comparable efforts [J].
den Elzen, Michel G. J. ;
Hohne, Niklas ;
Hagemann, Markus M. ;
van Vliet, Jasper ;
van Vuuren, Detlef P. .
MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2010, 15 (05) :433-465
[10]   An effective allocation criterion for CO2 emissions [J].
Gupta, S ;
Bhandari, PM .
ENERGY POLICY, 1999, 27 (12) :727-736