Identifying key factors in the evaluation of tenders for projects and services

被引:60
作者
Watt, D. J. [1 ,2 ]
Kayis, B. [1 ]
Willey, K. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Fac Engn, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Jacobs Australia, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] Univ Technol Sydney, Broadway, NSW 2007, Australia
关键词
Contractor selection; Evaluation criteria; Project management services; Tender evaluations; CONTRACTOR SELECTION CRITERIA; FRAMEWORK; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijproman.2008.03.002
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Clients select contractors on the basis of the relative importance of tender evaluation criteria, such as, experience, expertise, past performance, and cost. This paper presents the results of a recent study that sought to identify a suite of representative (principal) tender evaluation and contractor selection criteria for use in future research. The study included an examination of management literature on contractor selection and tender evaluation, and an exploratory survey. For each we developed a separate master list and mapped all identified and reported criteria into one of 16 defined categories. Threshold tests were applied to identify common and unique categories and an absolute difference test to determine the principal categories of criteria used in the evaluation of tenders. The study, using a pragmatic and heuristic approach, resulted in the identification of eight principal categories suitable for our research program. The findings indicate that the preferred criteria for evaluating tenders are those which provide a measure of contractors' ability in terms of their management and technical capability, past experience and performance, reputation, and the proposed method of delivery or technical solution. (c) 2008 Elsevier Ltd and IPMA. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 260
页数:11
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Performance modeling for contractor selection [J].
Alarcón, LF ;
Mourgues, C .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2002, 18 (02) :52-60
[2]   Framework for evaluating bids of construction contractors [J].
Alsugair, AM .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 1999, 15 (02) :72-78
[3]  
Cheung F.K. T., 2002, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V20, P569, DOI DOI 10.1080/01446190210159818
[4]  
Chinyio E.A., 1998, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V16, P91, DOI [10.1080/014461998372628, DOI 10.1080/014461998372628]
[5]   VENDOR SELECTION AND BUYING PROCESS [J].
DEMPSEY, WA .
INDUSTRIAL MARKETING MANAGEMENT, 1978, 7 (04) :257-267
[6]   THE MULTIATTRIBUTE EVALUATION OF PROGRAM-PLANNING CONTRACTORS [J].
DYER, JS ;
LORBER, HW .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1982, 10 (06) :673-678
[7]   Contractor selection using multicriteria utility theory: An additive model [J].
Hatush, Z ;
Skitmore, M .
BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 33 (2-3) :105-115
[8]  
Hatush Z., 1997, CONSTR MANAG ECON, V15, P19, DOI [10.1080/014461997373088, DOI 10.1080/014461997373088]
[9]  
Hensher D. A., 2000, TRANSPORT POLICY, V7, P279
[10]  
Holt G.D., 1994, European Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, V1, P139, DOI [10.1016/09697012(94)90003-5, DOI 10.1016/0969-7012(94)90003-5]