Parental Negotiations of the Moral Terrain of Risk in Relation to Young People with Intellectual Disabilities

被引:21
作者
Almack, Kathryn [1 ]
Clegg, Jennifer [2 ]
Murphy, Elizabeth
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Queens Med Ctr, Sch Nursing, Sue Ryder Care Ctr Palliat & End Life Studies, Nottingham NG7 2UH, England
[2] Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, Nottingham, England
关键词
risk; transition; parents; carers; young people; intellectual disabilities; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1002/casp.992
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This paper draws upon parental accounts from a Study of the process of transition for a cohort of 28 young people with relatively severe intellectual disabilities who left special schools in 2004 and 2005 in two adjacent English localities. This paper examines how parents negotiate these boundaries and position themselves in relation to risk. A primary concern identified by parents during this transition period focuses on the risk of harm facing these Vulnerable young people (whether through accidents or through sexual, emotional, physical or financial abuse) as they move into the adult world. These concerns are juxtaposed with discourses that increasingly promote the possibilities for people with intellectual disabilities to express and follow their own wishes and aspirations. For example, the policy agenda in England and Wales actively endorses the start of adult life as a time of opportunity for young people and promotes the values of independence and choice. In accounting for the management of risk in the young people's lives, we conclude that parents navigate complex boundaries between being seen to be over-protective and 'letting go'; between trusting others to act in the young adults' best interests and allowing these young people the autonomy to negotiate risk. Copyright (C) 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:286 / 298
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Welfare agencies and risk: the missing link? [J].
Alaszewski, A ;
Manthorpe, J .
HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY, 1998, 6 (01) :4-15
[2]  
Alaszewski A., 2002, British Journal of Learning Disabilities, V30, P56, DOI [10.1046/j.1468-3156.2001.00153.x, DOI 10.1046/J.1468-3156.2001.00153.X]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GOVERNING SOUL
[4]   Tensions around inclusion: Reframing the moral horizon [J].
Clegg, Jennifer ;
Murphy, Elizabeth ;
Almack, Kathryn ;
Harvey, Anna .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED RESEARCH IN INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES, 2008, 21 (01) :81-94
[5]  
Department of Health, 2001, VAL PEOPL NEW STRAT
[6]  
DOUGLAS A, 1992, RISK BLAME ESSAYS CU
[7]  
Douglas M., 1985, Risk acceptability according to the social sciences
[8]   Independence or protection - does it have to be a choice? Reflections on the abuse of people with learning disabilities in Cornwall [J].
Fyson, Rachel ;
Kitson, Deborah .
CRITICAL SOCIAL POLICY, 2007, 27 (03) :426-436
[9]  
Heyman B., 1993, DISABILITY HANDICAP, V8, P143
[10]   Managing risk and contingency: interaction and accounting behaviour [J].
Horlick-Jones, T .
HEALTH RISK & SOCIETY, 2003, 5 (02) :221-228