Comparing GIS-based support vector machine kernel functions for landslide susceptibility mapping

被引:94
作者
Feizizadeh, Bakhtiar [1 ,2 ]
Roodposhti, Majid Shadman [3 ]
Blaschke, Thomas [4 ]
Aryal, Jagannath [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Dept Remote Sensing, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Univ Tabriz, GIS, Tabriz, Iran
[3] Univ Tasmania, Sch Land & Food, Discipline Geog & Spatial Sci, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[4] Salzburg Univ, Dept Geoinformat, Z GIS, Salzburg, Austria
关键词
Kernel function; Landslide susceptibility; mapping; Southern Izeh; Support vector machine; URMIA LAKE BASIN; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; SPATIAL PREDICTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; DECISION TREE; MODELS; FUZZY; PROVINCE; HAZARDS; REGION;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-017-2918-z
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This study compares the predictive performance of GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) using four different kernel functions in support vector machines (SVMs). Nine possible causal criteria were considered based on earlier similar studies for an area in the eastern part of the Khuzestan province of southern Iran. Different models and the resulting landslide susceptibility maps were created using information on known landslide events from a landslide inventory dataset. The models were trained using landslide inventory dataset. A two-step accuracy assessment was implemented to validate the results and to compare the capability of each function. The radial basis function was identified as the most efficient kernel function for LSM with the resulting landslide susceptibility map showing the highest predictive accuracy, followed by the polynomial kernel function. According to the obtained results, it concluded that using SVMs can generally be considered to be an effective method for LSM while it demands careful consideration of kernel function. The results of the present research will also assist other researchers to select the best SVM kernel function to use for LSM.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Abe S, 2010, ADV PATTERN RECOGNIT, P21, DOI 10.1007/978-1-84996-098-4_2
[2]  
[Anonymous], GEOPHYS RES ABSTR EG
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, TECHNICAL REPORT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, International Journal of Geoinformatics
[5]   The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan [J].
Ayalew, L ;
Yamagishi, H .
GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2005, 65 (1-2) :15-31
[6]  
Bak M, 2009, SUPPORT VECTOR CLASS, V2009, P399
[7]   Support Vector Machines for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Staffora River Basin Case Study, Italy [J].
Ballabio, Cristiano ;
Sterlacchini, Simone .
MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 44 (01) :47-70
[8]  
Ben-Hur A, 2010, METHODS MOL BIOL, V609, P223, DOI 10.1007/978-1-60327-241-4_13
[9]  
Boser B. E., 1992, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual ACM Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, P144, DOI 10.1145/130385.130401
[10]   Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation [J].
Brenning, A .
NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2005, 5 (06) :853-862