Keystone species and food webs

被引:206
作者
Jordan, Ferenc [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Coll Budapest, Inst Adv Study, H-1014 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Hungarian Nat Hist Museum, Anim Ecol Res Grp, H-1431 Budapest, Hungary
[3] Univ Trent, Ctr Computat & Syst Biol, I-38100 Trento, Italy
关键词
centrality; food web; indirect effect; keystone species; network analysis; COMMUNITY VIABILITY ANALYSIS; SECONDARY EXTINCTIONS; ECOLOGICAL NETWORKS; ECOSYSTEM; COMPETITION; PATTERNS; FACILITATION; BOTTLENECKS; RELIABILITY; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1098/rstb.2008.0335
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Different species are of different importance in maintaining ecosystem functions in natural communities. Quantitative approaches are needed to identify unusually important or influential, 'keystone' species particularly for conservation purposes. Since the importance of some species may largely be the consequence of their rich interaction structure, one possible quantitative approach to identify the most influential species is to study their position in the network of interspecific interactions. In this paper, I discuss the role of network analysis (and centrality indices in particular) in this process and present a new and simple approach to characterizing the interaction structures of each species in a complex network. Understanding the linkage between structure and dynamics is a condition to test the results of topological studies, I briefly overview our current knowledge on this issue. The study of key nodes in networks has become an increasingly general interest in several disciplines: I will discuss some parallels. Finally, I will argue that conservation biology needs to devote more attention to identify and conserve keystone species and relatively less attention to rarity.
引用
收藏
页码:1733 / 1741
页数:9
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Abrams Peter A., 1996, P371
[2]   Secondary extinctions in ecological networks: Bottlenecks unveiled [J].
Allesina, S ;
Bodini, A ;
Bondavalli, C .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 194 (1-3) :150-161
[3]   Who dominates whom in the ecosystem? Energy flow bottlenecks and cascading extinctions [J].
Allesina, S ;
Bodini, A .
JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 2004, 230 (03) :351-358
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1961, Gen. Syst
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, THESIS U BRIT COLUMB
[6]   THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF 6 MARINE ECOSYSTEMS [J].
BAIRD, D ;
MCGLADE, JM ;
ULANOWICZ, RE .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1991, 333 (1266) :15-29
[7]  
Bakun A., 1996, PATTERNS OCEAN OCEAN, p332 pp
[8]   The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks [J].
Bascompte, J ;
Jordano, P ;
Melián, CJ ;
Olesen, JM .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (16) :9383-9387
[9]   COMPETITION AND FACILITATION IN MARSH PLANTS [J].
BERTNESS, MD ;
SHUMWAY, SW .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1993, 142 (04) :718-724
[10]  
Bond W.J., 1994, BIODIVERSITY ECOSYST