What do pediatric primary care providers think are important research questions? A perspective from PROS providers

被引:34
作者
Chien, Alyna
Coker, Tumaini
Choi, Lillian
Slora, Eric
Bodnar, Paul
Weiley, Victoria
Wasserman, Richard
Johnson, Julie
机构
[1] Amer Board Med Specialties, Evanston, IL USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Dept Med, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Dept Pediat, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Amer Acad Pediat, Dept Res, Elk Grove Village, IL USA
[5] Univ Chicago, Dept Pediat, Pediat Residency Program, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[6] Univ Chicago, Robert Wood Johnson Clin Scholars Program, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
pediatrics; primary care; translational research;
D O I
10.1016/j.ambp.2006.07.002
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Objective.-To describe what pediatric primary care providers involved in the Pediatric Research in Office Settings (PROS) research network think are important yet inadequately addressed questions in pediatric primary care research. Methods.-A total of 1785 pediatric primary care providers in the PROS network were asked what they thought were important yet inadequately addressed areas of primary care research. We used a single, open-ended question in a mail survey. Written answers to this question were analyzed by qualitative methods to determine the main themes of interest to pediatric primary care providers. Results.-Overall survey response rate was 48.7%; the open-ended question yielded 1109 individual answers. Six lines of inquiry were identified as being important to these providers: (1) effective counseling techniques to use in anticipatory guidance; (2) strategies to prevent and treat obesity; (3) the effectiveness of well-child care; (4) ongoing management of patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder; (5) the role of the primary care provider in caring for children with mental health needs; and (6) optimal organization of office practices. Conclusions.-The translation of research into practice may be improved by a better understanding of the needs and interests of those who see pediatric patients in the primary care setting.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 355
页数:4
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*AM AC PED, CLIN PRACT GUID
[2]   The ecology of medical care for children in the United States [J].
Dovey, S ;
Weitzman, M ;
Fryer, G ;
Green, L ;
Yawn, B ;
Lanier, D ;
Phillips, R .
PEDIATRICS, 2003, 111 (05) :1024-1029
[3]  
Dulcan MK, 1997, J AM ACAD CHILD PSY, V36, P1311
[4]   Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care [J].
Ely, JW ;
Osheroff, JA ;
Ebell, MH ;
Bergus, GR ;
Levy, BT ;
Chambliss, ML ;
Evans, ER .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 319 (7206) :358-361
[5]   The ecology of medical care revisited [J].
Green, LA ;
Fryer, GE ;
Yawn, BP ;
Lanier, D ;
Dovey, SM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (26) :2021-2025
[6]   From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care [J].
Grol, R ;
Grimshaw, J .
LANCET, 2003, 362 (9391) :1225-1230
[7]  
Herrerias CT, 2001, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V63, P1803
[8]   Implementing the American Academy of Pediatrics attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic guidelines in primary care settings [J].
Leslie, LK ;
Weckerly, J ;
Plemmons, D ;
Landsverk, J ;
Eastman, S .
PEDIATRICS, 2004, 114 (01) :129-140
[9]   Practice-based research networks - The laboratories of primary care research [J].
Lindbloom, EJ ;
Ewigman, BG ;
Hickner, JM .
MEDICAL CARE, 2004, 42 (04) :45-49
[10]  
Miles M., 1994, Qualitative data analysis, V2nd ed.