The analysis of skin-to-stiffener debonding in composite aerospace structures

被引:55
|
作者
Yap, JWH
Scott, ML
Thomson, RS
Hachenberg, D
机构
[1] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[2] Adv Composite Struct Ltd, Cooperat Res Ctr, Port Melbourne, Vic 3207, Australia
[3] Airbus Deutschland GmbH, D-21129 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
debonding; postbuckling; composite stiffened panel; finite element analysis; strain energy release rate;
D O I
10.1016/S0263-8223(02)00110-1
中图分类号
O3 [力学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0801 ;
摘要
A comprehensive finite element (FE) analytical tool to predict the effect of defects and damage in composite structures was developed for rapid and accurate damage assessment. The structures under consideration were curved, T-stiffened, multi-rib, composite panels representative of those widely used in aerospace primary structures. The damage assessment focussed on skin-to-stiffener debonding, a common defect that can critically reduce the performance of composite structires with integral or secondary bonded stiffeners. The analytical tool was validated using experimental data obtained from the structural test of a large stiffened panel that contained an artificial skin-to-stiffener debond. Excellent agreement between FE analysis and test results was obtained. The onset of crack growth predictions also compared well with the test observation. Since the general damage tolerance philosophy in composite structures follows the "no-growth" principle, the critical parameters were established based the onset of crack growth determined using fracture mechanics calculations, Parametric studies were conducted using the analytical tool in order to understand the structural behaviour in the postbuckling range and to determine the critical parameters. Parameters considered included debond size. debond location. debond type, multiple debonds and laminate lay-up. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 435
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Test results for prediction of composite stresses at skin-stiffener interface
    de, Nicolas, F.
    Huertas, M.
    1993, 6
  • [42] Debonding defect detection of metal and composite bonding structures
    Shang, Yuke
    Wang, Xinjun
    Li, Ping
    Yang, Nengjun
    4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED COMPOSITE MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING ENGINEERING 2017, 2017, 207
  • [43] Panel stiffener debonding analysis using a shell/3D modeling technique
    Krueger, Ronald
    Ratcliffe, James G.
    Minguet, Pierre J.
    COMPOSITES SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2009, 69 (14) : 2352 - 2362
  • [45] SKIN/STIFFENER INTERFACE DELAMINATION USING CONTINUOUS ANALYSIS
    WANG, JTS
    HUANG, JT
    COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 1995, 30 (03) : 319 - 328
  • [46] EFFICIENT STRESS SOLUTIONS AT SKIN STIFFENER INTERFACES OF COMPOSITE STIFFENED PANELS
    KASSAPOGLOU, C
    DINICOLA, AJ
    AIAA JOURNAL, 1992, 30 (07) : 1833 - 1839
  • [47] New composite tooling: Material and concept for aerospace composite structures
    Boursier, Bruno
    Callis, Rick
    Porter, John
    SAMPE JOURNAL, 2006, 42 (06) : 60 - 66
  • [48] Virtual testing of realistic aerospace composite structures
    Davies, G. A. O.
    Ankersen, J.
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 2008, 43 (20) : 6586 - 6592
  • [49] Composite additive manufacturing of morphing aerospace structures
    Fasel, Urban
    Keidel, Dominic
    Baumann, Leo
    Cavolina, Giovanni
    Eichenhofer, Martin
    Ermanni, Paolo
    MANUFACTURING LETTERS, 2020, 23 : 85 - 88
  • [50] Complexity of Understanding the Failure of Aerospace Composite Structures
    Daniel J. Thomas
    Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 2016, 16 (4) : 513 - 514