Choosing dialysis modality: decision making in a chronic illness context

被引:50
作者
Winterbottom, Anna [1 ]
Bekker, Hilary L. [2 ]
Conner, Mark [3 ]
Mooney, Andrew [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leeds, Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Inst Psychol Sci, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] St James Univ Hosp, Adult Renal Serv, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
chronic kidney disease; dialysis; end stage renal failure; patient decision making; qualitative; STAGE RENAL-DISEASE; OF-LIFE; CHOICE; HEMODIALYSIS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00798.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are encouraged to make an informed decision about dialysis. Survival rates for dialysis are equivalent yet there is wide variation in peritoneal dialysis uptake in the adult UK population. It is unclear how much is attributable to variations in patients' preferences. Kidney function usually declines over months and years; few studies have addressed how a chronic illness context affects choice. This study describes patients' decision making about dialysis and understands how the experience of CKD is associated with treatment choice. Method Survey employing interview methods explored 20 patients' views and experiences of making their dialysis choice. Data were analysed using thematic framework analysis to provide descriptive accounts of how patients experienced their illness and made treatment decisions. Results Patients talked about challenges of living with CKD. Patients were provided with lots of information about treatment options in different formats. Patients did not distinguish between different types of dialysis and/or have an in-depth knowledge about options. Patients did not talk about dialysis options as a choice but rather as a treatment they were going to have. Conclusion Most patients perceived their choice as between 'dialysis' and 'no dialysis'. They did not perceive themselves to be making an active choice. Possibly, patients feel they do not need to engage with the decision until symptomatic. Despite lots of patient information, there were more opportunities to encounter positive information about haemodialysis. A more proactive approach is required to enable patients to engage fully with the dialysis treatment options.
引用
收藏
页码:710 / 723
页数:14
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, NAT SERV FRAM REN SE
[2]  
[Anonymous], HLTH AFFAIRS WEB EXC
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods
[4]   Renal dialysis abatement: lessons from a social study [J].
Ashby, M ;
Hoog, CO ;
Kellehear, A ;
Kerr, PG ;
Brooks, D ;
Nicholls, K ;
Forrest, M .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2005, 19 (05) :389-396
[5]   Use of focus groups to identify concerns about dialysis [J].
Bass, EB ;
Jenckes, MW ;
Fink, NE ;
Cagney, KA ;
Wu, AW ;
Sadler, JH ;
Meyer, KB ;
Levey, AS ;
Powe, NR .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1999, 19 (03) :287-295
[6]  
Bath J, 2003, EDTNA ERCA J, V29, P85
[7]  
Bekker H, 1999, Health Technol Assess, V3, P1
[8]  
Bekker H.L., 2009, Shared decision-making in health care-Achieving evidence-based patient choice, P45
[9]   Understanding why decision aids work: linking process with outcome [J].
Bekker, HL ;
Hewison, J ;
Thornton, JG .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2003, 50 (03) :323-329
[10]  
Bowling A, 2005, HDB HLTH RES METHODS, P331