Effects of chlorination and ultraviolet light on environmental tetracycline-resistant bacteria and tet(W) in water

被引:39
作者
Sullivan, Bailey A. [1 ]
Vance, Cherish C. [2 ]
Gentry, Terry J. [3 ]
Karthikeyan, Raghupathy [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Biol & Agr Engn, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Soil & Crop Sci, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Disinfection; Antibiotic resistance genes; Environmental resistance; qPCR; WASTE-WATER; ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANCE; TREATMENT PLANTS; ESCHERICHIA-COLI; AQUATIC SYSTEMS; DISINFECTION; GENES; EFFLUENTS; INACTIVATION; HOTSPOTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jece.2016.12.052
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The effectiveness of traditional water disinfection methods against both environmental antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) and antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs) is still not well understood. The study objective was to evaluate two common methods for reducing concentrations of not only culturable tetracycline-resistant bacteria but also a resistance tet(W) gene fragment that has been frequently detected in the environment. Disinfection experiments were performed by exposing tetracyclineresistant isolates to various dosages of sodium hypochlorite or ultraviolet irradiation (UV). Concentrations of resistant bacteria and the tet(W) gene fragment were determined at 0 and 24 h after disinfection using traditional plating techniques and qPCR, respectively. Both the UV and chlorine disinfection methods were highly effective in initially reducing bacterial concentrations, and the chlorine disinfection method was more effective in preventing regrowth. However, both UV and chlorine disinfection were less consistent at reducing the concentration of the tet(W) gene fragment than for culturable resistant-bacteria at the dosages studied. Results indicated that after disinfection, resistance genes may remain detectable even if culturable resistant-bacteria are not, and that environmental ARBs and ARGs may survive these commonly used methods. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 784
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Upstream of the SOS response: figure out the trigger [J].
Aertsen, Abram ;
Michiels, Chris W. .
TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 14 (10) :421-423
[2]   Molecular ecology of tetracycline resistance: Development and validation of primers for detection of tetracycline resistance genes encoding ribosomal protection proteins [J].
Aminov, RI ;
Garrigues-Jeanjean, N ;
Mackie, RI .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 67 (01) :22-32
[3]   Antibiotic resistance and its cost: is it possible to reverse resistance? [J].
Andersson, Dan I. ;
Hughes, Diarmaid .
NATURE REVIEWS MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 8 (04) :260-271
[4]   Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments [J].
Baquero, Fernando ;
Martinez, Jose-Luis ;
Canton, Rafael .
CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2008, 19 (03) :260-265
[5]   Environmental Conditions Influence eDNA Persistence in Aquatic Systems [J].
Barnes, Matthew A. ;
Turner, Cameron R. ;
Jerde, Christopher L. ;
Renshaw, Mark A. ;
Chadderton, W. Lindsay ;
Lodge, David M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 48 (03) :1819-1827
[6]   Occurrence and Persistence of Erythromycin Resistance Genes (erm) and Tetracycline Resistance Genes (tet) in Waste Treatment Systems on Swine Farms [J].
Chen, Jing ;
Michel, Frederick C., Jr. ;
Sreevatsan, Srinand ;
Morrison, Mark ;
Yu, Zhongtang .
MICROBIAL ECOLOGY, 2010, 60 (03) :479-486
[7]   Effects of ultraviolet light disinfection on tetracycline-resistant bacteria in wastewater effluents [J].
Childress, H. ;
Sullivan, B. ;
Kaur, J. ;
Karthikeyan, R. .
JOURNAL OF WATER AND HEALTH, 2014, 12 (03) :404-409
[8]  
Croghan C.W., 2003, METHODS DEALING VALU
[9]   Genetic exchange between bacteria in the environment [J].
Davison, J .
PLASMID, 1999, 42 (02) :73-91
[10]   Potential impacts of disinfection processes on elimination and deactivation of antibiotic resistance genes during water and wastewater treatment [J].
Dodd, Michael C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING, 2012, 14 (07) :1754-1771