Geometrical differences in target volumes based on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography and four-dimensional computed tomography maximum intensity projection images of primary thoracic esophageal cancer

被引:5
作者
Guo, Y. [1 ]
Li, J. [1 ]
Wang, W. [1 ]
Zhang, Y. [1 ]
Wang, J. [1 ]
Duan, Y. [1 ]
Shang, D. [2 ]
Fu, Z. [3 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Jinan 250117, Shandong, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Med Phys, Jinan 250117, Shandong, Peoples R China
[3] Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Nucl Med, Jinan 250117, Shandong, Peoples R China
关键词
F-18-FDG PET; CT; four-dimensional computed tomography; internal gross target volume; maximum intensity projection; standardized uptake value; thoracic esophageal cancer; GROSS TUMOR VOLUME; LUNG-CANCER; RADIOTHERAPY; PET/CT; MOTION; PHANTOM; SCAN; CT;
D O I
10.1111/dote.12247
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of the study was to compare geometrical differences of target volumes based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) maximum intensity projection (MIP) and F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (F-18-FDG PET/CT) images of primary thoracic esophageal cancer for radiation treatment. Twenty-one patients with thoracic esophageal cancer sequentially underwent contrast-enhanced three-dimensional computed tomography (3DCT), 4DCT, and F-18-FDG PET/CT thoracic simulation scans during normal free breathing. The internal gross target volume defined as IGTV(MIP) was obtained by contouring on MIP images. The gross target volumes based on PET/CT images (GTV(PET)) were determined with nine different standardized uptake value (SUV) thresholds and manual contouring: SUV 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 (SUVn); 20%, 25%, 30%, 35%, 40% of the maximum (percentages of SUVmax, SUVn%). The differences in volume ratio (VR), conformity index (CI), and degree of inclusion (DI) between IGTV(MIP) and GTV(PET) were investigated. The mean centroid distance between GTV(PET) and IGTV(MIP) ranged from 4.98mm to 6.53mm. The VR ranged from 0.37 to 1.34, being significantly (P < 0.05) closest to 1 at SUV2.5 (0.94), SUV20% (1.07), or manual contouring (1.10). The mean CI ranged from 0.34 to 0.58, being significantly closest to 1 (P < 0.05) at SUV2.0 (0.55), SUV2.5 (0.56), SUV20% (0.56), SUV25% (0.53), or manual contouring (0.58). The mean DI of GTV(PET) in IGTV(MIP) ranged from 0.61 to 0.91, and the mean DI of IGTV(MIP) in GTV(PET) ranged from 0.34 to 0.86. The SUV threshold setting of SUV2.5, SUV20% or manual contouring yields the best tumor VR and CI with internal-gross target volume contoured on MIP of 4DCT dataset, but 3DPET/CT and 4DCT MIP could not replace each other for motion encompassing target volume delineation for radiation treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:744 / 750
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Identification of residual metabolic-active areas within NSCLC tumours using a pre-radiotherapy FDG-PET-CT scan: A prospective validation [J].
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. ;
Bussink, Johan ;
Oyen, Wim J. G. ;
van Elmpt, Wouter ;
Folgering, Annemieke M. ;
Emans, Daisy ;
Velders, Marije ;
Lambin, Philippe ;
De Ruysscher, Dirk .
LUNG CANCER, 2012, 75 (01) :73-76
[2]   Detection and compensation of organ/lesion motion using 4D-PET/CT respiratory gated acquisition techniques [J].
Bettinardi, Valentino ;
Picchio, Maria ;
Di Muzio, Nadia ;
Gianolli, Luigi ;
Gilardi, Maria Carla ;
Messa, Cristina .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (03) :311-316
[3]  
Bezjak A, 2012, Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol), V24, P508, DOI 10.1016/j.clon.2012.05.007
[4]   Can pet provide the 3D extent of tumor motion for individualized internal target volumes? A phantom study of the limitations of CY and the promise of PET [J].
Caldwell, CB ;
Mah, K ;
Skinner, M ;
Danjoux, CE .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2003, 55 (05) :1381-1393
[5]   Motion effects on SUV and lesion volume in 3D and 4D PET scanning [J].
Callahan, J. ;
Binns, D. ;
Dunn, L. ;
Kron, T. .
AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2011, 34 (04) :489-495
[6]   The clinical significance and management of lesion motion due to respiration during PET/CT scanning [J].
Callahan, Jason ;
Kron, Tomas ;
Schneider-Kolsky, Michal ;
Hicks, Rodney J. .
CANCER IMAGING, 2011, 11 (01) :224-236
[7]   Determination of Internal Target Volume From a Single Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Scan in Lung Cancer [J].
Chang, Guoping ;
Chang, Tingting ;
Pan, Tinsu ;
Clark, John W. ;
Mawlawi, Osama R. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 83 (01) :459-466
[8]  
Ezhil M, 2009, RADIAT ONCOL, V27, P1
[9]   Deformable versus rigid registration of PET/CT images for radiation treatment planning of head and neck and lung cancer patients: a retrospective dosimetric comparison [J].
Fortin, Dominique ;
Basran, Parminder S. ;
Berrang, Tanya ;
Peterson, David ;
Wai, Elaine S. .
RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2014, 9
[10]   COMPARISON OF 18F-FLUOROTHYMIDINE AND 18F-FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE PET/CT IN DELINEATING GROSS TUMOR VOLUME BY OPTIMAL THRESHOLD IN PATIENTS WITH SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA OF THORACIC ESOPHAGUS [J].
Han, Dali ;
Yu, Jinming ;
Yu, Yonghua ;
Zhang, Guifang ;
Zhong, Xaojun ;
Lu, Jie ;
Yin, Yong ;
Fu, Zheng ;
Mu, Dianbin ;
Zhang, Baijiang ;
He, Wei ;
Huo, Zhijun ;
Liu, Xijun ;
Kong, Lei ;
Zhao, Shuqiang ;
Sun, Xiangyu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2010, 76 (04) :1235-1241