Measuring the radiation exposure of Norwegian reindeer under field conditions

被引:13
作者
Aramrun, Kitkawin [1 ,5 ]
Beresford, Nicholas A. [1 ,2 ]
Skuterud, Lavrans [3 ]
Hevroy, Tanya H. [3 ]
Drefvelin, Jon [3 ]
Bennett, Kip [4 ]
Yurosko, Craig [4 ]
Phruksarojanakun, Phiphat [5 ]
Esoa, Jeerawa [6 ]
Yongprawat, Monthon [6 ,7 ]
Siegenthaler, Andjin [1 ]
Fawkes, Ross [1 ]
Tumnoi, Wanwiwa [8 ]
Wood, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Salford, Sch Environm & Lfe Sci, Peel Bldg, Manchester M5 4WT, Lancs, England
[2] Lancaster Environm Ctr, NERC Ctr Ecol & Hydrol, CEH Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4AP, England
[3] Norwegian Radiat & Nucl Safely Author DSA, Grini Naeringspk 13, N-1361 Osteras, Norway
[4] Mirion Technol, 2652 McGaw Ave, Irvine, CA 92614 USA
[5] OAP, 16 Vibravadi Rangsit Rd, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
[6] TINT, 9-9 Moo 7, Ongkharak 26120, Nakorn Nayok, Thailand
[7] Univ Gottingen, Geosci Ctr, Dept Appl Geol, Goldschmidtstr 3, D-37077 Gottingen, Germany
[8] Silpakorn Univ, Fac Sci, Muang 73000, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
External dose measurement; Norway; ERICA tool; Passive dosimeter; Large mammal; CHERNOBYL EXCLUSION ZONE; ABSORBED DOSE-RATES; RADIONUCLIDE TRANSFER; TERRESTRIAL WILDLIFE; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; RADIOACTIVITY; MODELS; BIOTA;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.177
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Models and approaches have been developed to predict radiation exposure of wildlife under field conditions. However, there have been few attempts to directly measure radiation exposure of wildlife in the field and confirm the doses predicted by models. This is a potential issue for stakeholder acceptance of modelling-based assessments. Here is presented a comprehensive study comparing the results of different dosimeters fitted to free-ranging reindeer inhabiting an area that received comparatively high radiocaesium deposition from the 1986 Chernobyl accident. The external dose of reindeer was measured using the four dosimeter types in aluminium box mounted on the GPS collar. The measurements were compared with two model predictions: (i) external dose to reindeer across the entire range area of the herd; and (ii) external doses of individual reindeer predicted using GPS tracking data to determine locations. It was found that although significant differences between the estimates of the various dosimeterswere found these were small with no practical implication. Also, the mean predicted external doses using the GPS tracking data were not significantly different to estimates from two of the four passive dosimeter results. The average external dose predicted across the herd area was significantly lower than doses recorded by the dosimeters and also estimates using GPS data to determine reindeer location (and hence exposure). For Cs-137 the average external dose from the GPS tracking data was about twice that predicted across the herd area, because collared animals favoured the more contaminated area of the study site. This suggests that in some circumstances the assumption of averaging contamination over an assumed home range within assessments may be inadequate though this would need to be balanced against other uncertainties. Natural radiation was the greatest contribution to reindeer exposure and a function of the high altitude. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1337 / 1343
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Aramrun P, 2018, MEASURING TERRESTRIA
[2]   Selecting passive dosimetry technologies for measuring the external dose of terrestrial wildlife [J].
Aramrun, Phakphum ;
Beresford, Nicholas A. ;
Wood, Michael D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2018, 182 :128-137
[3]  
Backe S, 1986, CESIUM FALLOUT NORWA, V18
[4]  
Baranwal V.C., 2011, MAPPING CAESIUM FALL
[5]   Inter-comparison of absorbed dose rates for non-human biota [J].
Batlle, J. Vives i ;
Balonov, M. ;
Beaugelin-Seiller, K. ;
Beresford, N. A. ;
Brown, J. ;
Cheng, J-J. ;
Copplestone, D. ;
Doi, M. ;
Filistovic, V. ;
Golikov, V. ;
Horyna, J. ;
Hosseini, A. ;
Howard, B. J. ;
Jones, S. R. ;
Kamboj, S. ;
Kryshev, A. ;
Nedveckaite, T. ;
Olyslaegers, G. ;
Proehl, G. ;
Sazykina, T. ;
Ulanovsky, A. ;
Lynch, S. Vives ;
Yankovich, T. ;
Yu, C. .
RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2007, 46 (04) :349-373
[6]   Estimating the exposure of small mammals at three sites within the Chernobyl exclusion zone - a test application of the ERICA Tool [J].
Beresford, N. A. ;
Gaschak, S. ;
Barnett, C. L. ;
Howard, B. J. ;
Chizhevsky, I. ;
Stromman, G. ;
Oughton, D. H. ;
Wright, S. M. ;
Maksimenko, A. ;
Copplestone, D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2008, 99 (09) :1496-1502
[7]   Background exposure rates of terrestrial wildlife in England and Wales [J].
Beresford, N. A. ;
Barnett, C. L. ;
Jones, D. G. ;
Wood, M. D. ;
Appleton, J. D. ;
Breward, N. ;
Copplestone, D. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY, 2008, 99 (09) :1430-1439
[8]   Predicting the radiation exposure of terrestrial wildlife in the Chernobyl exclusion zone: an international comparison of approaches [J].
Beresford, N. A. ;
Barnett, C. L. ;
Brown, J. E. ;
Cheng, J-J ;
Copplestone, D. ;
Gaschak, S. ;
Hosseini, A. ;
Howard, B. J. ;
Kamboj, S. ;
Nedveckaite, T. ;
Olyslaegers, G. ;
Smith, J. T. ;
Vives i Batlle, J. ;
Vives-Lynch, S. ;
Yu, C. .
JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION, 2010, 30 (02) :341-373
[9]  
Beresford N. A, 2019, J ENV RADIOACT
[10]   Predicting radionuclide transfer to wild animals: an application of a proposed environmental impact assessment framework to the Chernobyl exclusion zone [J].
Beresford, NA ;
Wright, SM ;
Barnett, CL ;
Wood, MD ;
Gaschak, S ;
Arkhipov, A ;
Sazykina, TG ;
Howard, BJ .
RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS, 2005, 44 (03) :161-168