Extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment: Soft tissue profile changes in borderline class I patients

被引:8
|
作者
Soheilifar, Sepideh [1 ]
Soheilifar, Sanaz
Ataei, Hooman
Mollabashi, Vahid [1 ]
Amini, Payam [2 ]
Bakhshaei, Anahita [3 ]
Naghdi, Navid [4 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Dept Orthodont, Dent Res Ctr, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Ahvaz Jundishapur Univ Med Sci, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Ahvaz, Iran
[3] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Fac Dent, Dept Orthodont, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Implant Res Ctr, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Hamadan, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
tooth extraction; orthodontics; cephalometry; Angle class I malocclusion; FACIAL-PROFILE; NASOLABIAL ANGLE; NONEXTRACTION; PREMOLARS; THERAPY; LONG;
D O I
10.17219/dmp/119102
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background. The decision regarding the selection of extraction or non-extraction orthodontic treatment is a common challenge in orthodontic treatment planning. Objectives. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the soft tissue profile of borderline class I patients. Material and methods. In this retrospective study, 70 patients were selected from among those referred to the Department of Orthodontics of the Faculty of Dentistry at Hamadan University of Medical Sciences in Iran. The inclusion criteria were skeletal class I, 4-10 mm of space deficiency, and the possibility of applying both extraction and non-extraction orthodontic treatment. All patients underwent fixed orthodontic treatment with the use of 0.022-inch-slot edgewise brackets. The patients were divided into 2 groups (n = 35) according to the 4-premolar extraction or non-extraction treatment plan. The 2 groups were compared by means of the cephalometric analysis. Results. There were 11 males and 24 females at a mean age of 17.46 years in the non-extraction group, and 9 males and 26 females at a mean age of 18.46 years in the extraction group. The upper and lower incisors as well as the lower lip moved forward in the non-extraction group (lower lip to E-plane = 0.87 +/- 1.39 mm, U1-SN = 2.83 +/- 8.03 degrees, IMPA = 4.64 +/- 5.47 degrees). The incisors and the lips moved backward in the extraction group (upper lip to E-plane = -1.42 +/- 2.08 mm, lower lip to E-plane = -1.56 +/- 1.97 mm, U1-SN = -7.63 +/- 9.02 degrees, IMPA = -7.05 +/- 6.79 degrees). The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Mentolabial sulcus became more pronounced in the non-extraction group (1.92 +/- 2.73 mm; p < 0.001) and shallower in the extraction group (-1.90 +/- 4.2 mm; p = 0.000). Conclusions. Orthodontic treatment can change the soft tissue appearance of the lower third of the face. The lips and the incisors moved forward in the non-extraction group and backward in the extraction group.
引用
收藏
页码:275 / 283
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Soft Tissue Profile Response in Extraction Versus Non-Extraction Orthodontic Treatment
    Khan, Munizeh
    Fida, Mubassar
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2010, 20 (07): : 454 - 459
  • [2] A geometric morphometric evaluation of hard and soft tissue profile changes in borderline extraction versus non-extraction patients
    Kouli, Afroditi
    Papagiannis, Alexandros
    Konstantoni, Nikoleta
    Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
    Konstantonis, Dimitrios
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2019, 41 (03) : 264 - 272
  • [3] The therapeutic changes in extraction versus non-extraction orthodontic treatment
    Saelens, NA
    De Smit, AA
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 1998, 20 (03) : 225 - 236
  • [4] Three-dimensional soft tissue changes in orthodontic extraction and non-extraction patients: A prospective study
    Rongo, Roberto
    Nissen, Line
    Leroy, Cecile
    Michelotti, Ambrosina
    Cattaneo, Paolo M.
    Cornelis, Marie A.
    ORTHODONTICS & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH, 2021, 24 : 181 - 192
  • [5] Lip profile changes from non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    Hughes, DR
    Lindauer, SJ
    Sheats, RD
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 76 : 898 - 898
  • [6] Comparison of extraction vs. non-extraction orthodontic outcomes for borderline patients.
    Xu, T. -M.
    Huang, W.
    Yang, M. -Z.
    Liu, Y.
    Baumrind, S.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2003, 82 : B374 - B374
  • [7] Therapeutic Decision in Class I Borderline Cases: Extraction vs. Non-Extraction
    Kompacher, A.
    Wendl, B.
    Pichelmayer, M.
    Weiland, F.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2015, 47 (02): : 80 - 85
  • [8] Arch dimensions changes in non-extraction orthodontic treatment.
    White, EA
    Lindauer, SJ
    Britto, AD
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2000, 79 : 246 - 246
  • [9] Third Molar Comparison in Class I and II Extraction and Non-extraction Orthodontic Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study
    Pena-Reyes, Danelin
    Freitas, Jessica Quereza
    Freitas, Karina Maria Salvatore
    Bellini-Pereira, Silvio Augusto
    Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
    Janson, Guilherme
    Freitas, Marcos Roberto
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2024, 37 (01) : 7 - 13
  • [10] The impact of extraction vs nonextraction treatment on soft tissue changes in Class I borderline malocclusions
    Konstantonis, Dimitrios
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2012, 82 (02) : 209 - 217