Does environmental administrative penalty promote the quantity and quality of green technology innovation in China? Analysis based on the peer effect

被引:4
作者
Chen, Xuan [1 ]
Zhan, Meng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Ocean Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
environmental administrative penalty; green technology innovation; peer effect; heterogeneity; moderating effect; PERFORMANCE EVIDENCE; PORTER HYPOTHESIS; CONSTRAINTS; IMPACT; COST;
D O I
10.3389/fenvs.2022.1070614
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As the guarantee for the effective implementation of environmental policies, the spillover of the deterrent effect of environmental administrative penalties is crucial for solving the environmental regulatory dilemma. It is also unclear whether environmental administrative penalties can affect green technology innovation of the peer enterprises and whether they have an impact on both the quantity and quality dimensions. Taking listed firms of heavily polluting industries in China's Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share from 2016 to 2020 as the sample, this paper analyzes the impact of the environmental administrative penalty on the quantity and quality of corporate green technology innovation based on the perspective of peer effect. The results indicate that: 1) Environmental administrative penalty significantly promotes the quantity and quality of peer enterprises' green technology innovation. 2) Heterogeneity analysis shows that the diversity of penalties, the competitiveness of the penalized enterprises, and the property rights of peer enterprises all contribute to the different impacts of the environmental administrative penalty on the peer enterprises' green technology innovation. 3) Further analysis shows that the promotion effect will be weakened when peer enterprises face high financing constraints. The research results expand the related research on direct government regulation and green technology innovation from the perspective of peer effect and provide policy reference for the government to formulate differentiated penalty policies according to the heterogeneity of enterprise.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 95 条
  • [1] Taxation and the International Mobility of Inventors
    Akcigit, Ufuk
    Baslandze, Salome
    Stantcheva, Stefanie
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (10) : 2930 - 2981
  • [2] Imitation or innovation: To what extent do exploitative learning and exploratory learning foster imitation strategy and innovation strategy for sustained competitive advantage?
    Ali, Murad
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2021, 165
  • [3] A path towards carbon mitigation amidst economic policy uncertainty in BRICS: an advanced panel analysis
    Ali, Shahid
    Jiang, Junfeng
    Ahmad, Mahmood
    Usman, Ojonugwa
    Ahmed, Zahoor
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (41) : 62579 - 62591
  • [4] Sub-National Institutional Contingencies and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance: Evidence from China
    Ali, Shahid
    Zhang, Junrui
    Usman, Muhammad
    Khan, Farman Ullah
    Ikram, Amir
    Anwar, Bilal
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (19)
  • [5] The Porter Hypothesis at 20: Can Environmental Regulation Enhance Innovation and Competitiveness?
    Ambec, Stefan
    Cohen, Mark A.
    Elgie, Stewart
    Lanoie, Paul
    [J]. REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY, 2013, 7 (01) : 2 - 22
  • [6] Ayres I., 1995, RESPONSIVE REGULATIO
  • [7] Beccaria C., 1985, CRIMES PUNISHMENTS
  • [8] Bi Q., 2018, COLLECT ESSAYS FINAN, V235, P37, DOI [10.13762/j.cnki.cjlc.2018.07.003, DOI 10.13762/J.CNKI.CJLC.2018.07.003]
  • [9] Household Finances and Social Interaction: Bayesian Analysis of Household Panel Data
    Brown, Sarah
    Ghosh, Pulak
    Taylor, Karl
    [J]. REVIEW OF INCOME AND WEALTH, 2016, 62 (03) : 467 - 488
  • [10] [蔡绍洪 Cai Shaohong], 2017, [中国软科学, China Soft Science], P30