SVD-based optimal filtering technique for noise reduction in hearing aids using two microphones

被引:6
作者
Maj, JB
Moonen, M
Wouters, J
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Lab Exp ORL, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Katholieke Univ Leuven, ESAT, SISTA, B-3001 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
SVD-based technique; beamforming; noise reduction; hearing aids; speech intelligibility; diffuse noise;
D O I
10.1155/S1110865702000690
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
We introduce a new SVD-based (singular value decomposition) strategy for noise reduction in hearing aids. This technique is evaluated for noise reduction in a behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid where two omnidirectional microphones are mounted in an endfire configuration. The behaviour of the SVD-based technique is compared to a two-stage adaptive beamformer for hearing aids developed by Vanden Berghe and Wouters (1998). The evaluation and comparison is done with a performance metric based on the speech intelligibility index (SII). The speech and noise signals are recorded in reverberant conditions with a signal-to-noise ratio of 0 dB and the spectrum of the noise signals is similar to the spectrum of the speech signal. The SVD-based technique works without initialization nor assumptions about a look direction, unlike the two-stage adaptive beamformer. Still, for different noise scenarios, the SVD-based technique performs as well as the two-stage adaptive beamformer, for a similar filter length and adaptation time for the filter coefficients. In a diffuse noise scenario, the SVD-based technique performs better than the two-stage adaptive beamformer and hence provides a more flexible and robust solution under speaker position variations and reverberant conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 443
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
American National Standards Institute, 1997, S35 ANSI
[2]  
American National Standards Institute, 1969, ANSIS35
[3]   AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM AVERAGE SPEECH SPECTRA [J].
BYRNE, D ;
DILLON, H ;
TRAN, K ;
ARLINGER, S ;
WILBRAHAM, K ;
COX, R ;
HAGERMAN, B ;
HETU, R ;
KEI, J ;
LUI, C ;
KIESSLING, J ;
KOTBY, MN ;
NASSER, NHA ;
ELKHOLY, WAH ;
NAKANISHI, Y ;
OYER, H ;
POWELL, R ;
STEPHENS, D ;
MEREDITH, R ;
SIRIMANNA, T ;
TAVARTKILADZE, G ;
FROLENKOV, GI ;
WESTERMAN, S ;
LUDVIGSEN, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 96 (04) :2108-2120
[4]  
CALLAHAN MW, 1976, ACOUSTIC SIGNAL PROC
[5]   ROBUST ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING [J].
COX, H ;
ZESKIND, RM ;
OWEN, MM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ACOUSTICS SPEECH AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1987, 35 (10) :1365-1376
[6]  
Doclo S, 2001, DIGITAL SIGNAL PROC, P111
[7]  
Doclo S., 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics. WASPAA'99 (Cat. No.99TH8452), P143, DOI 10.1109/ASPAA.1999.810870
[8]   EVALUATION OF AN ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING METHOD FOR HEARING-AIDS [J].
GREENBERG, JE ;
ZUREK, PM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1992, 91 (03) :1662-1676
[9]   INTELLIGIBILITY-WEIGHTED MEASURES OF SPEECH-TO-INTERFERENCE RATIO AND SPEECH SYSTEM PERFORMANCE [J].
GREENBERG, JE ;
PETERSON, PM ;
ZUREK, PM .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1993, 94 (05) :3009-3010
[10]   AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH TO LINEARLY CONSTRAINED ADAPTIVE BEAMFORMING [J].
GRIFFITHS, LJ ;
JIM, CW .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ANTENNAS AND PROPAGATION, 1982, 30 (01) :27-34