Impact of BRCA1/BRCA2 counseling and testing on newly diagnosed breast cancer patients

被引:192
作者
Schwartz, MD
Lerman, C
Brogan, B
Peshkin, BN
Halbert, CH
DeMarco, T
Lawrence, W
Main, D
Finch, C
Magnant, C
Pennanen, M
Tsangaris, T
Willey, S
Isaacs, C
机构
[1] Georgetown Univ, Lombardi Canc Ctr, Dept Oncol, Washington, DC USA
[2] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Dept Psychiat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1200/JCO.2004.04.086
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose Approximately 5% to 10% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Given these patients' high risk for contralateral breast cancer, bilateral mastectomy is increasingly considered a treatment option for newly diagnosed BRCA1/2 carriers. In the present study, we prospectively evaluated the impact on surgical decision-making of pretreatment genetic counseling and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing among breast cancer patients at high-risk for carrying a mutation. Patients and Methods Participants were 194 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients who had not yet received definitive surgical treatment and who had at least a 10% prior probability of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation. Participants were offered free genetic counseling and rapid BRCA1/2 testing. Primary analyses focused on the impact of BRCA1/2 test result on subsequent breast cancer surgical treatment. Results Forty-eight percent of patients who were found to carry a BRCA1/2 mutation chose bilateral mastectomy as their definitive breast cancer surgery. In contrast, 24% of patients in whom no mutation was detected and 4% of test decliners opted for bilateral mastectomy. Additional predictors of bilateral mastectomy included patients' self-reports of physician recommendations for BRCA1/2 testing and bilateral mastectomy. Conclusion This study highlights patient interest in and the technical feasibility of offering presurgery BRCA1/2 testing to high-risk patients. Most importantly, these results demonstrate that BRCA1/2 test results significantly affect patients' surgical decision-making. The availability of genetic counseling and testing could serve as a valuable aid to patient decision-making for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at high-risk for carrying a mutation. (C) 2004 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
引用
收藏
页码:1823 / 1829
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory STAI (form Y)
  • [2] Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument
    Brady, MJ
    Cella, DF
    Mo, F
    Bonomi, AE
    Tulsky, DS
    Lloyd, SR
    Deasy, S
    Cobleigh, M
    Shiomoto, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (03) : 974 - 986
  • [3] Breast Canc Linkage Consortium, 1999, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V91, P1310
  • [4] American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement update: Genetic testing for cancer susceptibility
    Bruinooge, SS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (12) : 2397 - 2406
  • [5] THE FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CANCER-THERAPY SCALE - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL MEASURE
    CELLA, DF
    TULSKY, DS
    GRAY, G
    SARAFIAN, B
    LINN, E
    BONOMI, A
    SILBERMAN, M
    YELLEN, SB
    WINICOUR, P
    BRANNON, J
    ECKBERG, K
    LLOYD, S
    PURL, S
    BLENDOWSKI, C
    GOODMAN, M
    BARNICLE, M
    STEWART, I
    MCHALE, M
    BONOMI, P
    KAPLAN, E
    TAYLOR, S
    THOMAS, CR
    HARRIS, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1993, 11 (03) : 570 - 579
  • [6] Chen Y, 1999, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V8, P855
  • [7] Claus EB, 1996, CANCER, V77, P2318, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2318::AID-CNCR21>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-Z
  • [9] BRCA1 mutations in women attending clinics that evaluate the risk of breast cancer
    Couch, FJ
    DeShano, ML
    Blackwood, MA
    Calzone, K
    Stopfer, J
    Campeau, L
    Ganguly, A
    Rebbeck, T
    Weber, BL
    Jablon, L
    Cobleigh, MA
    Hoskins, K
    Garber, JE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 336 (20) : 1409 - 1415
  • [10] DeMarco T A, 2001, J Genet Couns, V10, P379, DOI 10.1023/A:1016689420536