Estimation of leaf area index and covered ground from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) in two contrasting forests

被引:208
作者
Riaño, D
Valladares, F
Condés, S
Chuvieco, E
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Ctr Spatial Technol & Remote Sensing, Dept Land Air & Water Resources, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] CSIC, Ctr Ciencias Medioambientales, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
[3] ETS Ingn Montes, Dept Econ & Gest Forestal, E-28040 Madrid, Spain
[4] Univ Alcala de Henares, Dept Geog, E-28801 Madrid, Spain
关键词
leaf area index; covered ground; hemispherical photography; Lidar;
D O I
10.1016/j.agrformet.2004.02.005
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Two canopy properties, leaf area index (LAI) and covered ground (CoverGnd), were estimated using hemispherical photography of three oak (Quercus pyrenaica) and eight pine (Pinus sylvestris) forest plots in Sierra de Guadarrama (central Spain). Pulses from airborne laser scanner (Lidar) that hit the surface on the exact location (within centimeter resolution) of the photographs were analyzed and separated by different radius size (from 0.5 to 20m). The correlation between Lidar and hemispherical photography estimates of canopy properties was highly significant, but was affected by the type of forest and the radius size. CoverGnd was better estimated using a small radius size (2.5 m, equivalent to one fourth of canopy height), while LAI was better estimated using a larger radius size (7.5-12.5 m, equivalent to the entire canopy height). In general, the smaller the tree, the shorter the radius was that must be used to select Lidar data, and the best Lidar estimator of canopy properties was the percentage of canopy hits. Overall oak canopies showed better results than pine forest. The poorer estimation in pine forest plots was probably due to the larger foliage and branch clumping of pine versus oak canopies. Lidar data could be used to produce high-resolution regional maps of the canopy properties studied. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   Retrieving leaf area index of boreal conifer forests using landsat TM images [J].
Chen, JM ;
Cihlar, J .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 55 (02) :153-162
[2]   Direct and indirect estimation of leaf area index, fAPAR, and net primary production of terrestrial ecosystems [J].
Gower, ST ;
Kucharik, CJ ;
Norman, JM .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 70 (01) :29-51
[3]   LINEAR REGRESSIONS FOR CANOPY COVER ESTIMATION IN ACACIA WOODLANDS USING LANDSAT-TM, LANDSAT-MSS AND SPOT HRV XS DATA [J].
LARSSON, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 1993, 14 (11) :2129-2136
[4]  
Lefsky MA, 2002, BIOSCIENCE, V52, P19, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0019:LRSFES]2.0.CO
[5]  
2
[6]   Derivations of stand heights from airborne laser scanner data with canopy-based quantile estimators [J].
Magnussen, S ;
Boudewyn, P .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 1998, 28 (07) :1016-1031
[7]   AIRBORNE LASER MEASUREMENTS OF RANGELAND CANOPY COVER AND DISTRIBUTION [J].
RITCHIE, JC ;
EVERITT, JH ;
ESCOBAR, DE ;
JACKSON, TJ ;
DAVIS, MR .
JOURNAL OF RANGE MANAGEMENT, 1992, 45 (02) :189-193
[8]   Leaf area index estimates obtained for clumped canopies using hemispherical photography [J].
van Gardingen, PR ;
Jackson, GE ;
Hernandez-Daumas, S ;
Russell, G ;
Sharp, L .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1999, 94 (3-4) :243-257
[9]  
VONHANSEN W, 1999, GEOINFORMATION, V4, P229